China – EU’s “Significant Other”?

Not a Chess Game Strategy

Authors

  • Martin Milanov Sofia University “St. Kliment Ohridski”

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.18.2021.73.03

Keywords:

European Union, China, strategy, identity, governance

Abstract

Following the idea of the “other” in the work of Ernesto Laclau and the perspective of post-foundational discourse analysis, the study focusses on Chinese strategical internal and external pre- and post-Covid-19 political specifics and policies and how they interact (or contradict) with the “European” vision of the world and most importantly itself. As Laclau says, “the notion of “constitutive outside” emphasizes the always present possibility that differential relationship between an entity and its “constitutive outside” turns into antagonism.” For more than three decades, the EC/EU has been steadily building up its foreign relations architecture and has proven its desire to project its ideals and values worldwide. However, during the same period, after “the century of humiliation,” China has also reached a point in its history where it wants to see the world according to its national interests and views. This work attempts to analyze some key features inherent to both the EU and China, such as strategies, relation with other countries, typical governmental architecture, and some aspects of identity, which could help in better understanding the possible contradictions and areas of cooperation in their way of conceptualizing themselves as key players on the world stage. This will reflect the need for greater European civic awareness in the upcoming decades, as suggested by the author.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Martin Milanov, Sofia University “St. Kliment Ohridski”

Is a PhD student at Sofia University in the Faculty of European Studies. He is primarily concentrating his work in the field of European and Chinese Identity related to the foreign policy as his master’s degrees are in “European integration and diplomacy of EU” in the same faculty with a thesis “European Common Foreign and Security Policy and the global initiative “One belt, One Road” of China” and in “International Organisations and Multilateral Diplomacy” in the Faculty of Law and International Relations in Sofia University with a thesis on “European Common Foreign and Security Policy in the East-Asian world order.”

References

Allison G., Destined for War: Can America and China Escape Thucydides’ Trap?, London 2018.

Bertram B., “New Reflections on the ‘Revolutionary’ Politics of Ernesto Laclau and Chantal Mouffe”, Duke University Press, vol. 22, no. 3 (1995), pp. 81-110, https://doi.org/10.2307/303724.

“China: Communists Likely to Enshrine ‘Xi Jinping Thought’”, DW, 19 October 2017, at https://www.dw.com/en/china-communists-likely-to-enshrine-xi-jinping-thought/a-41027158.

China Investment, Africa Version, Ministry of Commerce of the People’s Republic of China (MOFCOM).

Chunrong L., “The New Logic of China’s Global Influence”, Friends of Europe, 12 January 2017, at https://www.friendsofeurope.org/insights/the-new-logic-of-chinas-global-influence/.

Cook S., China’s Global Media Footprint Democratic Responses to Expanding Authoritarian Influence 2021, at https://www.ned.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Chinas-Global-Media-Footprint-Democratic-Responses-to-Expanding-Authoritarian-Influence-Cook-Feb-2021.pdf.

EU Position in World Trade, 2019, at http://ec.europa.eu/trade/policy/eu-position-in-worldtrade/.

Eurostat. China-EU – International Trade in Goods Statistics, 2020, at https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=China-EU_-_international_trade_in_goods_statistics#EU-China_most_traded_goods.

Ferguson N., The Square and the Tower, New York 2018.

Grace, A., “China’s Influence Operations Are Pinpointing America’s Weaknesses”, Foreign Policy, 10 April 2018, at https://foreignpolicy.com/2018/10/04/chinas-influenceoperations-are-pinpointing-americas-weaknesses/.

Gu J., China’s Private Enterprises in Africa and the Implications for African Development. The Power of the Chinese Dragon, London 2016, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-57449-7_7.

Hartz R., “‘The People’ and Its Antagonistic Other: The Populist Right-Wing Movement Pegida in Germany”, in T. Marttila (ed.), Discourse, Culture and Organization. Postdisciplinary Studies in Discourse, Cham 2019, pp. 223-244, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94123-3_10.

Hemenway D., “Chinese Strategic Engagement with Assad’s Syria”, Atlantic Council, 21 December 2018, at https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/syriasource/chinese-strategicengagement-with-assad-s-syria/.

Herbert J., “Ssŭma Ch’ien’s Historical Records: Introductory Chapter,” transl. by H.J. Allen, The Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland (1894).

“Hu Jintao Calls for Enhancing ‘Soft Power’ of Chinese Culture”, Beijing Review, November 2017, at http://www.bjreview.com.cn/17thCPC/txt/2007-10/15/content_80539.htm.

Huaxia, “What are China’s Two Centennial Goals and Why do They Matter?”, New China, 17 October 2017, at http://www.xinhuanet.com/english/2017-10/17/c_136686770.htm.

“Is China Taking Advantage of COVID-19 to Pursue South China Sea Ambitions?”, DW, 26 May 2020, at https://www.dw.com/en/is-china-taking-advantage-of-covid-19-to-pursuesouth-china-sea-ambitions/a-53573918.

Jacques M., at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uBjvklYLShM – [00:02:42-00:04:05].

Kissinger H., On China, New York 2013.

Kissinger H., World Order, New York 2014.

Labrador E.C., “The Venezuelan Exodus”, Council on Foreign Relations, 2019, at https://www.cfr.org/in-brief/venezuelan-exodus.

Leung K. et al., “Culture and International Business: Recent Advanced and Future Directions”, Journal of International Business Studies, vol. 36 (2005), pp. 357-378, https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400150.

Mohan G., “China in Africa: Impacts and Prospects for Accountable Development”, in S. Hickey, K. Sen, B. Bukenya (eds.), The Politics of Inclusive Development: Interrogating the Evidence, Oxford 2014, https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198722564.003.0011.

Shambaugh D., “China’s Quiet Diplomacy”, China: An International Journal, vol. 5, no. 1 (2007), pp. 26-54, https://doi.org/10.1353/chn.2007.0004.Tanev T., The Statehood, Sofia 2013.

“The Role of China as an Education Aid Donor”, UNESCO Digital Library, 2015, at https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000232475.

Welsh J.M., “The Role of the Inner Enemy in European Self-definition: Identity, Culture and International Relations Theory”, History of European Ideas, vol. 19, nos 1-3 (1994), pp. 53-61, https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-6599(94)90197-X.

Whitten G. et al., “Do Political Relations Affect International Trade? Evidence from China’s Twelve Trading Partners”, Journal of Shipping and trade, vol. 5, no. 21 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1186/s41072-020-00076-w.

Wight M., Systems of States, Leicester 1977.

Žižek S., “Beyond Discourse – Analysis”, in New Reflections of Our Time. Verso, London–New York 1990.

Downloads

Published

2021-11-29

How to Cite

Milanov, Martin. 2021. “China – EU’s ‘Significant Other’? : Not a Chess Game Strategy”. Politeja 18 (4(73):53-65. https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.18.2021.73.03.