The chicken game jako model eksplanacyjno-prognostyczny w polityce
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.19.2022.77.08Keywords:
politics, rationality, game theory, decision-making processes, intimidation gameAbstract
“CHICKEN GAME” AS AN EXPLANATORY AND PROGNOSTIC MODEL IN POLITICS
The main aim of the article is to present one of the game theory models: chicken game. This model is highly valuable in the processes of analysis and forecasting of the behavior of political decision-makers. Chicken game combines the basic assumptions for game theory based on a rational model and elements of optimizing the results of political games through psychological influence, resisting blackmail, and intimidation of other players. The widespread use of such tactics and strategies justifies a closer and in-depth analysis of this model.
Downloads
PlumX Metrics of this article
References
Barton R.F., Wprowadzenie do symulacji i gier, przeł. A. Ehrlich, Warszawa 1974.
Google Scholar
Binmore K., Teoria gier, przeł. I. Konarzewska, Łódź 2017.
Google Scholar
Dawkins R., The Selfish Gene, Oxford 2006.
Google Scholar
Haman J., Teoria gier jako narzędzie politologa, „Athenaeum. Polskie studia politologiczne” 2012, vol. 36.
Google Scholar
Heus P. de, Hoogervorst N., Dijk E. van, Framing Prisoners and Chickens. Valence Effects in the Prisoner’s Dilemma and the Chicken Game, „Journal of Experimental Social Psychology” 2010, vol. 46, nr 5, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2010.04.013.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2010.04.013
Google Scholar
Kilber P., Wprowadzenie do teorii gier, Poznań 2020.
Google Scholar
Kim S.-P. [i in.], A Computer-Based Method for the Investigation of Human Behavior in the Iterative Chicken Game, „Frontiers in Psychology” 2021, vol. 12, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.576404.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.576404
Google Scholar
Klein G.A., Sztuka podejmowania decyzji. Dlaczego mądrzy ludzie dokonują złych wyborów, przeł. B. Sałbut, Gliwice 2010.
Google Scholar
Kozielecki J., Konflikt, teoria gier i psychologia, Warszawa 1970.
Google Scholar
Kozielecki J., Podejmowanie decyzji, [w:] Psychologia ogólna, t. 1, Percepcja, myślenie, decyzje, red. T. Tomaszewski, Warszawa 1995.
Google Scholar
Kozielecki J., Psychologiczna teoria decyzji, Warszawa 1995.
Google Scholar
Lipman B.L., Cooperation among Egoists in Prisoners’ Dilemma and Chicken Games, „Public Choice” 1986, vol. 51, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00128880.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00128880
Google Scholar
Malawski K., Wieczorek A., Sosnowska H., Konkurencja i kooperacja. Teoria gier w ekonomii i naukach społecznych, Warszawa 1997.
Google Scholar
Nash J.F., Equilibrium Points in N-Person Games, „Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America” 1950, vol. 36, nr 1, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.36.1.48.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.36.1.48
Google Scholar
Neumann J. von, Morgenstern O., Theory of Games and Economic Behavior, Princeton 2007.
Google Scholar
Nicolis J.S., Milias-Argitis J., Carabalis D., Dynamic Simulation of the Game of Chicken, „Kybernetes” 1983, vol. 12, nr 1, https://doi.org/10.1108/eb005634.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/eb005634
Google Scholar
Pietraś Z.J., Decydowanie polityczne, Warszawa–Kraków 2000.
Google Scholar
Rapoport A., Chammah A.M., The Game of Chicken, [w:] Game Theory in the Behavioral Sciences, red. I.R. Buchler, H.G. Nuttini, Pittsburgh 1969.
Google Scholar
Smith J.M., Evolution and the Theory of Games, Cambridge 1982, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511806292.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511806292
Google Scholar
Snyder G.H., “Prisoner’s Dilemma” and “Chicken” Models in International Politics, „International Studies Quarterly” 1971, vol. 15, nr 1, https://doi.org/10.2307/3013593.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3013593
Google Scholar
Straffin P.D., Teoria gier, przeł J. Haman, Warszawa 2004.Tyszka T., Konflikty i strategie. Niektóre zastosowania teorii gier, Warszawa 1978.
Google Scholar
Tyszka T., Zaleśkiewicz T., Racjonalność decyzji. Pewność i ryzyko, Warszawa 2001.
Google Scholar
Tzu Sun, Sztuka wojny, różne wydania.
Google Scholar
Wang Y. [i in.], Effortless Retaliation. The Neural Dynamics of Interpersonal Intentions in the Chicken Game Using Brain–Computer Interface, „Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience” 2021, vol. 16, nr 11, https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsab064.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsab064
Google Scholar
Ward H., Teoria racjonalnego wyboru, [w:] Teorie i metody w naukach politycznych, red. D. Marsh, G. Stoker, przeł. J. Tegnerowicz, Kraków 2006.
Google Scholar
Williams J.D., Strateg doskonały. Wprowadzenie do teorii gier, przeł. I. Roman, Warszawa 1965.
Google Scholar
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
