Między widzialnością a autentycznością w demokracji

Przestrzeń polityki w filozofii Hannah Arendt i jej współczesne rekonfiguracje

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.21.2024.90.04

Keywords:

democracy, Hannah Arendt, visibility, authenticity, politics

Abstract

BETWEEN VISIBILITY AND AUTHENTICITY IN DEMOCRACY: THE SPACE OF POLITICS IN THE PHILOSOPHY OF HANNAH ARENDT AND ITS CONTEMPORARY RECONFIGURATIONS

The aim of the article is to look at the pluralistic democratic space of politics as a game of appearances devoid of authenticity, and shaped by contemporary media technologies in which political opinions have become a derivative of social cognition, referring primarily to perception (visualisation of politics). In this role, it replaced public debate, diversified in form and content, referring to the principles of rationality, which reflected the competitive system of interests and ideas. The theoretical basis for presenting democratic practice as a theatre game – more precisely, a strictly enacted and inauthentic staging based on diverse visual communication – will be Hannah Arendt’s phenomenological perspective. According to the philosopher, the space of politics is mainly a public area of exchange and confrontation in the dimension of visibility and audibility, where we are dealing with revealing ourselves (political actors) in the space of appearance (the articulation process as a result of subjective activity). The starting point for presenting the tension between authenticity and visibility resulting from Arendt’s assumptions will be a discussion of the attributes of a contemporary pluralistic society from the point of view of her theory of the human condition.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

PlumX Metrics of this article

Author Biographies

Piotr Łukomski, University of Wrocław, Poland

Doktor habilitowany, Zakład Teorii Polityki Instytutu Politologii Wydziału Nauk Społecznych Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego. Specjalizacja badawcza obejmuje teorię i filozofię polityki: modele eksplanacji zjawisk politycznych, teorię zachowań i umysłu politycznego, paradygmat kognitywny w naukach społecznych.

Filip Pierzchalski, University of Warsaw, Poland

Doktor habilitowany, politolog pracujący w Katedrze Teorii Polityki i Myśli Politycznej Wydziału Nauk Politycznych i Studiów Międzynarodowych Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego. Specjalizacja badawcza obejmuje teorię i filozofię polityki: kategorię podmiotowości politycznej, przywództwo polityczne, socjotechnikę polityczną oraz emocje w polityce.

References

Appadurai A., Introduction: Commodities and the Politics of Value, [w:] The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective, red. A. Appadurai, Cambridge 1986, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511819582. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511819582
Google Scholar

Apter D.E., Politics as Theatre: An Alternative View of the Rationalities of Power, [w:] Social Performance Symbolic Action, Cultural Pragmatics, and Ritual, red. J.C. Alexander, B. Giesen, J.L. Mast, Cambridge 2006, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511616839.008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511616839.008
Google Scholar

Arendt H., Kondycja ludzka, przeł. A. Łagodzka, Warszawa 2000.
Google Scholar

Arendt H., Myślenie, przeł. H. Buczyńska-Garewicz, Warszawa 1991.
Google Scholar

Arendt H., O przemocy. Nieposłuszeństwo obywatelskie, przeł. A. Łagodzka, W. Madej, Warszawa 1999.
Google Scholar

Arendt H., O rewolucji, przeł. M. Godyń, Warszawa 2003.
Google Scholar

Arese L., Tragedy, Comedy and History in On Revolution, „European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology” 2014, vol. 1(3), Special Issue on the 50th Anniversary of Hannah Arendt’s„On Revolution”, https://doi.org/10.1080/23254823.2014.990235. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23254823.2014.990235
Google Scholar

Bates S., Jenkins L., Amery F., (De)Politicisation and the Father’s Clause Parliamentary Debates, „Policy and Politics” 2014, vol. 42(2), https://doi.org/10.1332/030557312X656007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1332/030557312X656007
Google Scholar

Baudrillard J., In the Shadow of the Silent Majorities, or, the End of the Social and Other Essays, New York 1983.
Google Scholar

Bauman Z., The Individualized Society, Cambridge 2001.
Google Scholar

Best B., Marx and the Dynamic of the Capital Formation: An Aesthetics of Political Economy, New York 2010, https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230107762. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230107762
Google Scholar

Beyme K. von, Parliamentary Democracy Democratization, Destabilization, Reconsolidation, 1789-1999, London 2000.
Google Scholar

Blau P.M., Exchange and Power in Social Life, New York 1964.
Google Scholar

Brey P., Artifacts as Social Agents, [w:] Inside the Politics of Technology: Agency and Normativity in the Co-Production of Technology and Society, red. H. Harbers, Amsterdam 2005, https://doi.org/10.1017/9789048503841.004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9789048503841.004
Google Scholar

Broad R., The Washington Consensus Meets the Global Backlash: Shifting Debates and Policies, „Globalizations” 2004, vol. 1(2), https://doi.org/10.1080/1474773042000308523. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1474773042000308523
Google Scholar

Buckler S., Hannah Arendt and Political Theory: Challenging the Tradition, Edinburgh 2011, https://doi.org/10.1515/9780748646326. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780748646326
Google Scholar

The Cambridge Companion to Hannah Arendt, red. D. Villa, Cambridge 2000.
Google Scholar

Carnoy M, The State and Political Theory, Princeton–New Jersey 1984, https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400853458. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400853458
Google Scholar

Chartouny L., Phenomenology and the Political Philosophy of Hannah Arendt, [w:] The Oxford Handbook of Phenomenologies and Organization Studies, red. F.X. de Vaujany, J. Aroles, M. Pérezts, Oxford 2023, https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780192865755.013.10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780192865755.013.10
Google Scholar

Cunningham F., Theories of Democracy: A Critical Introduction, London–New York 2002, https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203466247. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203466247
Google Scholar

Dahl R.A., A Preface to Democratic Theory, Chicago–London 2006, https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226118727.001.0001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226118727.001.0001
Google Scholar

Dahl R.A., Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition, New Haven 1971.
Google Scholar

Dahl R.A., On Democracy, New Haven–London 1998.
Google Scholar

Dahrendorf R., Class and Class Conflict in Industrial Society, Stanford 1959.
Google Scholar

Elster J., The Market and the Forum: Three Varieties of Political Theory, [w:] Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reason and Politics, red. J. Bohman, W. Rehg, Cambridge 1997, https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/2324.003.0004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/2324.003.0004
Google Scholar

Esping-Andersen G., The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, Princeton 1990. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/095892879100100108
Google Scholar

Forestal J., Constructing Digital Democracies: Facebook, Arendt, and the Politics of Design, „Political Studies” 2021, vol. 69(1), https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321719890807. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321719890807
Google Scholar

Garsten B., Representative Government and Popular Sovereignty, [w:] Political Representation, red. I. Shapiro, S.C. Stokes, E.J. Wood, A.S. Kirshner, Cambridge 2009, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813146.006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813146.006
Google Scholar

Gray J., Two Faces of Liberalism, Cambridge 2000.
Google Scholar

Hall S., Notes of Deconstructing the „Popular”, [w:] People’s History and Socialist Theory, red. R. Samuel, London–New York 2016.
Google Scholar

Hall S., The ‘Structured Communication’ of Events. Discussion Paper, Birmingham 1973.
Google Scholar

Hall S., The Work of Representation, [w:] Representation: Cultural Representations and Signifying Practices, red. S. Hall, London 2003.
Google Scholar

Hardt M., Negri A., Multitude: War and Democracy in the Age of Empire, New York 2004.
Google Scholar

Harvey D., Spaces of Neoliberalization: Towards a Theory of Uneven Geographical Development, Stuttgart 2005.
Google Scholar

Hay C., Why We Hate Politics, Cambridge 2008.
Google Scholar

Held D., At the Global Crossroads: The End of the Washington Consensus and the Rise of Global Social Democracy?, [w:] The Global Politics of Globalization. „Empire” vs „Cosmopolis”, red. B. Gills, London–New York 2008.
Google Scholar

Held D., Models of Democracy, Cambridge 2006.
Google Scholar

Held K., Towards a Phenomenology of the Political World, [w:] The Oxford Handbook of Contemporary Phenomenology, red. D. Zahavi, Oxford 2012, https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199594900.013.0022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199594900.013.0022
Google Scholar

Hopfinger M., Kultura współczesna – audiowizualność, Warszawa 1985.
Google Scholar

Iacono A.M., The History and Theory of Fetishism, London 2016, https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137541154. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137541154
Google Scholar

Jameson F., Postmodernism, or, the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism, Durham 1991, https://doi.org/10.1515/9780822378419. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822378419
Google Scholar

Jay M., Nowoczesne władze wzroku, przeł. M. Kwiek, [w:] Przestrzeń, filozofia i architektura.
Google Scholar

Osiem rozmów o poznawaniu, produkowaniu i konsumowaniu przestrzeni, red. E. Rewers, Poznań 1999.
Google Scholar

Josefson J., Hannah Arendt’s Aesthetic Politics: Freedom and the Beautiful, Cham 2019, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18692-0. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18692-0
Google Scholar

Kertzer D.I., Ritual, Politics, and Power, New Haven 1988.
Google Scholar

Kowalska A., Nowy odbiorca? Przemiany obrazu odbiorcy w wybranych koncepcjach współczesnej kultury, Warszawa 2014.
Google Scholar

Loidolt S., Phenomenology of Plurality: Hannah Arendt on Political Intersubjectivity, New York– London 2018, https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315208565. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315208565
Google Scholar

Loughlin M., The Concept of Constituent Power, „European Journal of Political Theory” 2014, vol. 13(2), https://doi.org/10.1177/1474885113488766. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1474885113488766
Google Scholar

Łukomski P., Pandemonium jako model polityki. Hannah Arendt o idei działania, Warszawa 2022.
Google Scholar

Łukomski P., Polityka jako teatr, [w:] Metafory polityki, t. 2, red. B. Kaczmarek, Warszawa 2003.
Google Scholar

Łukomski P., Semiotyka przemocy w perspektywie gier językowych, [w:] Oblicza przemocy, red. J. Ziółkowski, P. Rutkowski, Warszawa 2019.
Google Scholar

Mandel E., Late Capitalism, London 1976.
Google Scholar

Marder M., Natality, Event, Revolution: The Political Phenomenology of Hannah Arendt, „Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology” 2013, vol. 44(3), https://doi.org/10.1080/00071773.2013.11006808. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00071773.2013.11006808
Google Scholar

Mouffe Ch., Hegemony and Ideology in Gramsci, [w:] Gramsci and Marxist Theory, red. Ch. Mouffe, London–Boston–Henley 1979.
Google Scholar

Mouffe Ch., On the Political, London–New York 2005.
Google Scholar

Mouffe Ch., Paradoks demokracji, przeł. W. Jach, M. Kamińska, A. Orzechowski, Wrocław 2005.
Google Scholar

Pettit P., On the People’s Terms: A Republican Theory and Model of Democracy, Cambridge 2012, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139017428. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139017428
Google Scholar

Portes Ch. des, Hannah Arendt’s Hidden Phenomenology of the Body, „Human Studies” 2022, vol. 45, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-021-09614-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-021-09614-2
Google Scholar

Przeworski A., Minimalist Conception of Democracy: A Defense, [w:] Democracy’s Value, red. I. Shapiro, C. Hacker-Cordón, Cambridge 1999.
Google Scholar

Rosanvallon P., Kontrdemokracja. Polityka w dobie nieufności, przeł. A. Czarnacka, Wrocław 2011.
Google Scholar

Rose G., Interpretacja materiałów wizualnych. Krytyczna metodologia badań nad wizualnością, przeł. E. Klekot, Warszawa 2010.
Google Scholar

Schaap A., Inequality, Loneliness, and Political Appearance: Picturing Radical Democracy with Hannah Arendt and Jacques Rancière, „Political Theory” 2021, vol. 49(1), https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591720920215. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591720920215
Google Scholar

Schechner R., Performatyka. Wstęp, przeł. T. Kubikowski, Wrocław 2006.
Google Scholar

Scheuerman W.E., Constituent Power and Civil Disobedience: Beyond the Nation-State?, „Journal of International Political Theory” 2018, vol. 10, https://doi.org/10.1177/175508821880. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1755088218806642
Google Scholar

Schmitter P.C., Still the Century of Corporatism?, [w:] The New Corporatism: Social-Political Structures in the Iberian World, red. F. Pike, T. Stritch, Notre Dame 1974.
Google Scholar

Shapiro I., Democracy’s Place, Ithaca 1996, https://doi.org/10.7591/9781501718236. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7591/9781501718236
Google Scholar

Shapiro I., The State of Democratic Theory, Princeton–Oxford 2003, https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400825899. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400825899
Google Scholar

Steinberger P.J., The Idea of the State, Cambridge 2004, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511490361. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511490361
Google Scholar

Taminiaux J., Bios politikos and bios theoretikos in the Phenomenology of Hannah Arendt, „International Journal of Philosophical Studies” 1996, vol. 4(2), https://doi.org/10.1080/09672559608570832. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09672559608570832
Google Scholar

Tchir T., Hannah Arendt’s Theory of Political Action. Daimonic Disclosure of the „Who”, Cham 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53438-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53438-1
Google Scholar

Tittenbrun J., Concepts of Capital: The Commodification of Social Life, London–New York 2014, https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315080727. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315080727
Google Scholar

Vatter M., Political Ontology, Constituent Power, and Representation, „Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy” 2015, vol. 18, https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2015.1092663. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2015.1092663
Google Scholar

Walzer M., Liberalism and the Art of Separation, „Political Theory” 1984, vol. 12(3), https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591784012003001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591784012003001
Google Scholar

Wenman M., Agonistic Democracy: Constituent Power in the Era of Globalisation, Cambridge 2013, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511777158. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511777158
Google Scholar

Williamson J., A Short History of the Washington Consensus, [w:] The Washington Consensus Reconsidered. Towards a New Global Governance, red. N. Serra, J. Stiglitz, Oxford 2008, https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199534081.003.0002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199534081.003.0002
Google Scholar

Wood M., Politicisation, Depoliticisation and Anti-Politics: Towards a Multilevel Research Agenda, „Political Studies Review” 2015, vol. 14, https://doi.org/10.1111/1478-9302.12074. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1478-9302.12074
Google Scholar

Zerilli L.M.G., Rethinking the Politics of Post-Truth with Hannah Arendt, [w:] Political Phenomenology. Experience, Ontology, Episteme, red. T. Bedorf, S. Herrmann, New York 2019, https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429259852-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429259852-8
Google Scholar

Ziółkowski M., Baranowski M., Drozdowski R., On the Multiple Varieties, Consequences and Paradoxes of the Commodification of Nature, „Polish Sociological Review” 2020, vol. 211(3), https://doi.org/ 10.26412/psr211.02.
Google Scholar

Published

2024-11-24

How to Cite

Łukomski, Piotr, and Filip Pierzchalski. 2024. “Między widzialnością a autentycznością W Demokracji: Przestrzeń Polityki W Filozofii Hannah Arendt I Jej współczesne Rekonfiguracje”. Politeja 21 (3(90):85-104. https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.21.2024.90.04.

Issue

Section

Political Theory