Granice wyobrażone i rzeczywiste – ewolucja i transgresja
Zmiana paradygmatu funkcjonowania organizacji na przykładzie krakowskiej organizacji Leance
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.16.2019.58.25Keywords:
teal organization, transgression, organizational change, nonviolent communication by Marshall RosenbergAbstract
Imaginary and Real Boundaries – Evolution and Transgression: The Change of an Organizational Model’s Paradigm Based on the Example of Leance – a Teal Organization from Krakow
The article discusses issues related to the real and imaginary limitations of the functioning of teal organizations. Both categories of boundaries are thought constructs, and the proposed distinction is determined by the process of transgression. A crossed barrier becomes an imaginary boundary, the one to be defeated remains real. The analysis of boundaries and transgression was based on the theory of psychotransgressionism by Józef Kozielecki, and the case study concerned the Krakow teal organization – Leance. The primary focus was on the area of communication, relations and interactions.
Downloads
PlumX Metrics of this article
References
Aldrich H.E., Organizations Evolving, London i in., 1999.
Google Scholar
Barker J., Tightening the Iron Cage: Concertive Control in Self‑Managing Teams, „Administrative Science Quarterly” 1993, vol. 38, nr 3.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2393374
Google Scholar
Beck D.E., Cowan Ch., Spiral Dynamics: Mastering Values, Leadership, and Change: Exploring the New Science of Memetics, Malden 2011.
Google Scholar
Belbin M.R., Management Teams: Why They Succeed or Fail, Oxford 1981.
Google Scholar
Brown S.L., Eisenhardt K.M., Competing on the Edge. Strategy as a Structured Chaos, Boston 1998.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-6301(98)00092-2
Google Scholar
Burnes B., Complexity Theories and Organizational Change, „International Journal of Management Reviews” 2005, vol. 7, nr 2.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2005.00107.x
Google Scholar
Burns T., Stalker G.M., The Management of Innovation, London 1961.
Google Scholar
Chrapko M., Holakracja – nowy sposób na zwinną firmę, 26 VIII 2014, [online] http://mariuszchrapko.com/holokracja‑nowy‑sposob‑na‑zwinna‑firme‑cz‑2‑z‑6/, 29 XII 2016.
Google Scholar
Collins D., A Socio‑Political Theory of Workplace Democracy: Class Conflict, Constituent Reactions and Organizational Outcomes at a Gainsharing Facility, „Organization Science” 1995, vol. 6, nr 6.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.6.6.628
Google Scholar
Cotton J., Vollrath D., Froggatt K. i in., Employee Participation: Diverse Forms and Different Outcomes, „Academy of Management Review” 1988, vol. 13, nr 1.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/258351
Google Scholar
Czubasiewicz H., Grajewski P., Koncepcja empowermentu w zarządzaniu organizacjami, „Studia i Prace Kolegium Zarządzania i Finansów, Zeszyt Naukowy” 2018, nr 162.
Google Scholar
Deal T.E., Kennedy A.A., Corporate Cultures: The Rites and Rituals of Corporate Life, Boston 1982.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0007-6813(83)90092-7
Google Scholar
Donaldson T., Dunfee T.W., Toward a Unified Conception of Business Ethics: Integrative Social Contracts Theory, „Academy of Management Review” 1994, vol. 19, nr 2.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/258705
Google Scholar
Dunphy D.C., Stace D.A., Under New Management: Australian Organizations in Transition, Sydney 1990.
Google Scholar
Freeman E.R., Gilbert D.R. Jr., Corporate Strategy and the Search for Ethics, Englewood Cliffs 1988.
Google Scholar
Hackman R.J., The Psychology of Self‑Management in Organizations, [w:] Psychology and Work: Productivity, Change, and Employment, red. M. Pallak, R. Perloff, Washington DC 1986.
Google Scholar
Hofstede G., Hofstede G.J., Minkov M., Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind, 3rd Edition, London–New York 2010.
Google Scholar
Holde, L., The Perception Gap in Employee Empowerment: A Comparative Study of Banks in Sweden and Britain, „Personal Review” 1999, vol. 28, nr 3.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/00483489910264606
Google Scholar
Kashtan M., Niezwykle świadome życie. Świat skrojony na miarę ludzkich potrzeb. T. I: Od oddzielenia do jedności, przeł. D. Pilas‑Wiśniewska, A. Klimek, Poznań 2017.
Google Scholar
Kozielecki J., Koncepcja transgresyjna człowieka. Analiza psychologiczna, Warszawa 1987.
Google Scholar
Kozielecki J., Psychotransgresjonizm. Nowy kierunek w psychologii, Warszawa 2001.
Google Scholar
Kozielecki J., Transgresja i kultura, Warszawa 1997.
Google Scholar
Koźmiński A.K., Latusek‑Jurczak D., Rozwój teorii organizacji. Od systemu do sieci, Warszawa 2017.
Google Scholar
Laloux F., Pracować inaczej, przeł. M. Konieczniak, Warszawa 2015.
Google Scholar
Leavitt H.J., Some Effects of Certain Communication Patterns on Group Performance, „The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology” 1951, nr 46.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0057189
Google Scholar
Lewin K., Action Research and Minority Problems, [w:] Resolving Social Conflicts, red. G.W. Lewin, New York 1946.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1946.tb02295.x
Google Scholar
Lincoln N.D., Travers Ch., Ackers P., Wilkinson A., The Meaning of Empowerment, the Interdisciplinary Etymology of a New Management Concept, „International Journal of Management Reviews” 2002, vol. 4, nr 3.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2370.00087
Google Scholar
Manz Ch., Sims Jr. H., Leading Workers to Lead Themselves: The External Leadership of Self‑Managing Work Teams, „Administrative Science Quarterly” 1987, vol. 32.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2392745
Google Scholar
McClelland D.C., Achievement Motive, New York 1953.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/11144-000
Google Scholar
McClelland D.C., The Achieving Society, Princeton NJ 1961.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/14359-000
Google Scholar
Miyashiro M.R., Empathy Factor. Your Competitive Advantage for Personal, Team, and Business Success, Encinitas, CA 2011.
Google Scholar
Penrose E.T., Growth of the Firm and Networking. W. Warner, ed. International Encyclopedia of Business and Management, London 1996.
Google Scholar
Penrose E.T., The Theory of the Growth of the Firm, New York 1959.
Google Scholar
Pfeffer J., Salancik G.R., The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective, New York 1978.
Google Scholar
Rosenberg M.B., Porozumienie bez przemocy: o języku życia, przeł. M. Kłobukowski, Warszawa 2017.
Google Scholar
Schein E.H., Organisational Culture. „American Psychologist” 1990, vol. 43.
Google Scholar
Tapscott D., Williams A., Makrowikinomia. Reset świata i biznesu, przeł. D. Bakalarz, Warszawa 2011.
Google Scholar
Trzcionka M., Turkusowa Organizacja. Żywy organizm, [w:] Wybrane aspekty przemian gospodarczych w Polsce, red. M. Geise, J. Oczki, D. Piotrowski, Bydgoszcz 2018.
Google Scholar
Wade J., Changes of Mind: A Holonomic Theory of the Evolution of Consciousness, New York 1996.
Google Scholar
Wilber K., Eksplozja świadomości, przeł. K. Przechrzta, E. Kluz, Kraków 1997.
Google Scholar
Wilber K., Niepodzielone. Wschodnie i zachodnie teorie rozwoju osobowości, przeł. T. Bieroń, Poznań 2014.
Google Scholar
Wilber K., Psychologia integralna. Świadomość, duch, psychologia, terapia, przeł. H. Smagacz, Warszawa 2000.
Google Scholar
Wilber K., The Atman Project: A Transpersonal View of Human Development, Wheaton IL 1996.
Google Scholar
Wilkinson A., Empowerment Theory and Practice, „Personnel Review” 1998, vol. 27, nr 10.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/00483489810368549
Google Scholar
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Marta Kułaga, Magdalena Trzcionka
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
