Review Process
The review process of Krakow Yearbook based on recommendations of Committee of Ethics in Science (zob. Dobre praktyki w procedurach recenzyjnych w nauce, Warsaw 2011) and principles of Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), see more: Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement.
- Submitting an article is tantamount to consenting to its inclusion in the review procedure.
- Submitted papers and source publications are submitted to an initial formal agency by the Editorial Board members.
- After passing the initial evaluation, the article is sent to the external evaluation.
- Each publication is evaluated by at least two independent reviewers. The editors select the most suitably qualified reviewers in a specific field.
- Reviewer must hold at least a PhD.
- Reviewers are appointed from an academic institution other than that of the Author’s.
- In the reviewing model neither authors nor reviewers know each other’s identities (double-blind review).
- The review has a written form.
- The review concludes with unequivocal decision concerning submitted article.
- All authors will inform about review result and will give review form for insight.
- All authors are obliged to provide retractions or corrections of mistakes.
- If the reviewers indicate a wide field of amendments, the article may be re-submitted for external evaluation.
- All authors have a right to dispute on substantive matter with review.
- The final decision to qualify or reject the article belongs to the Editorial Board.
The list of reviewers is published on the Krakow Yearbook’s website.
Reviewers 2023
Krzysztof Broński
Bartosz Drzewiecki
Marcin Fabiański
Jarosław Jarzewicz
Andrzej Laskowski
Huber Mazur
Łukasz T. Sroka
Michał Wiśniewski
Maciej Zdanek
