Testing the Infrastructure of Wiredu’s Non-Party Democracy

Authors

  • Emmanuel Ifeanyi Ani University of Ghana

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.17.2020.69.01

Keywords:

Kwasi Wiredu, non-party system of democracy, non-party polity

Abstract

Kwasi Wiredu’s proposal of a non-party system of democracy argues that we should have political associations rather than political parties. It advocates cooperation and consensus between these associations and encourages the removal or reduction of some constraints of the multi-party system, such as periodic elections. A critic has argued that this proposal is a recipe for despotism, whilst a supporter has stated that the critic misreads Wiredu’s statements. I attempt to resolve the disagreement by subjecting Wiredu’s non-party infrastructure to a test, a thought experiment that examines the consequences of having this system run by persons with the worst possible intentions. The outcome is that Wiredu’s non-party polity is too poorly equipped to protect us from the damages accruable from the unrestricted rule of such persons. Parties and elections could only be eliminated if supplanted by a political infrastructure that secures a more productive and moral leadership.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Emmanuel Ifeanyi Ani, University of Ghana

Is a Senior Lecturer of Philosophy at the University of Ghana. He was a Visiting Scholar at the Centre for Deliberative Democracy, Institute for Governance and Policy Analysis, University of Canberra, and is an Associate Editor of the Journal of Deliberative Democracy.

References

“Ghana’s 2016 Presidential Election Results”, Electoral Commission Ghana, 2016, at <http://www.ec.gov.gh/elections-results/71-2016-presidential-results.html>.

Gyekye K., Tradition and Modernity: Philosophical Reflections on the African Experience, New York 1997, https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195112252.001.0001.

Jacques C., “Alterity in the Discourse of African Philosophy: A Forgotten Absence”, in H. Lauer, K. Anyidoho (eds.), Reclaiming the Human Sciences and Humanities through African, vol. 2, Accra 2011.

Kaunda K., “The Future of Nationalism”, in G.-C.M. Mutiso, S.W. Rohio (eds.), Readings in African Political Thought, Nairobi 1975.

Lauer H., “Jacques on Wiredu: Appendix to Chapter Fifty-Seven”, in H. Lauer, K. Anyidoho (eds.), Readings in African Political Thought, Nairobi 1975.

Lijphart A., Democracies: Patterns of Majoritarian and Consensus Government in Twenty-one Countries, New Haven–London 1984, https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1ww3w2t.

Matolino B., “Rationality and Consensus in Kwasi Wiredu’s Traditional African Polities”, Theoria, no. 146 (2016), https://doi.org/10.3167/th.2016.6314603.

Matolino B., “The Nature of Opposition in Kwasi Wiredu’s Democracy by Consensus”, African Studies, vol. 72, no. 1 (2013), https://doi.org/10.1080/00020184.2013.776201.

“Presidential Results Summary Sheets by Constituencies”, Electoral Commission Ghana, 2020, at <https://www.ec.gov.gh/constituency-summary-sheet/>.

Sékou Touré A., “National Democracy”, in G.-C.M. Mutiso, S.W. Rohio (eds.), Readings in African Political Thought, Nairobi 1975.

Wiredu K., Cultural Universals and Particulars, Bloomington 1996.

Wiredu K., “The State, Civil Society, and Democracy in Africa”, in H. Lauer, K. Anyidoho (eds.), Reclaiming the Human Sciences and Humanities through African, vol. 2, Accra 2011.

Wiredu K., “Tradition, Democracy, and Political Legitimacy in Contemporary Africa”, Rewriting Africa: Toward Renaissance or Collapse?, The Japan Centre for Area Studies, Osaka 2001.

Published

2020-10-01

How to Cite

Ani, Emmanuel Ifeanyi. 2020. “Testing the Infrastructure of Wiredu’s Non-Party Democracy”. Politeja 17 (6(69):5-18. https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.17.2020.69.01.

Issue

Section

Systemy polityczne