Pomiędzy syndromem ekonomicznego progresywizmu a dekompozycją procesów politycznych
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.19.2022.77.10Keywords:
neoliberal way of development, political order, crisis, globalization of financial flowAbstract
BETWEEN THE SYNDROME OF ECONOMIC PROGRESSIVISM AND DECOMPOSITION POLITICAL PROCESSES
The article discusses the issue of the modernizing practices’ crisis, which arises at the very foundations of the political order. Changes in world development expose nuances and ambivalences of contemporary politics. Technical development of information transmission, transport, telecommunication and computerization as well as the globalization of financial flow, and an increasing number of foreign investors all create new conditions for changes on the levels of economy and politic system. The coronavirus pandemic compels us to reassess the main risks faced by the world and individual countries. The pandemic has set new requirements for sectors that have a direct impact on living conditions: education, healthcare, labor, recreation, the motivation system, etc.
Downloads
PlumX Metrics of this article
References
Amin S., The Ancient World-Systems versus the Modern Capitalist World-System, [w:] The World System. Five Hundred Years or Five Thousand?, red. A.G. Frank, B.K. Gills, London–New York 1993.
Google Scholar
Bauman Z., Płynne czasy. Życie w epoce niepewności, przeł. M. Żakowski, Warszawa 2007.
Google Scholar
Berezin M., Illiberal Politics in Neoliberal Times. Culture, Security and Populism in the New Europe, Cambridge–New York 2009.
Google Scholar
Beyme K. von, Współczesne teorie polityczne, przeł. J. Łoziński, Warszawa 2007.
Google Scholar
Brenner N., Peck J., Theodore N., After Neoliberalization?, „Globalizations” 2010, vol. 7, nr 3, https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731003669669.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731003669669
Google Scholar
Brown W., Undoing the Demos. Neoliberalism’s Stealth Revolution, New York 2015, https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt17kk9p8.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt17kk9p8
Google Scholar
Bruff I., The Rise of Authoritarian Neoliberalism, „A Journal of Economics, Culture & Society” 2014, vol. 26, nr 1, https://doi.org/10.1080/08935696.2013.843250.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08935696.2013.843250
Google Scholar
Brzeziński Z., Strategic Vision. America and the Crisis of Global Power, New York 2012.
Google Scholar
Chang H.-J., 23 rzeczy, których nie mówią ci o kapitalizmie, przeł. B. Szelewa, Warszawa 2010.
Google Scholar
Davis J.B., The Turn in Economics. Neoclassical Dominance to Mainstream Pluralism, „Journal of Institutional Economics” 2006, vol. 2, nr 1, https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137405000263.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137405000263
Google Scholar
Duménil G., Lévy D., The Crisis of Neoliberalism, Cambridge, MA 2011.
Google Scholar
Dunne T., McDonald M., The Politics of Liberal Internationalis, „International Politics” 2013, vol. 50, nr 1, https://doi.org/10.1057/ip.2012.25.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/ip.2012.25
Google Scholar
Dwa tysiące najbogatszych ma tyle, co 4,6 miliarda najbiedniejszych ludzi na świecie, Business Insider, 20 I 2020, [online] https://businessinsider.com.pl/finanse/mala-grupa-najbogatszych-ma-tyle-co-46-miliarda-najbiedniejszych-raport-oxfam/43yd98t.
Google Scholar
Eagleton T., Po co nam kultura?, przeł. A. Górny, Warszawa 2012.
Google Scholar
Eeckhout J., The Profit Paradox. How Thriving Firms Threaten the Future of Work, Princeton 2021, https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691222769.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691222769
Google Scholar
Ferguson N., Cywilizacja. Zachód i reszta świata, przeł. P. Szymor, Kraków 2013.
Google Scholar
Filipowicz S., O fundamentalnej roli interpretacji, „Politeja” 2015, vol. 12, nr 4 (36), https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.12.2015.36.12.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.12.2015.36.12
Google Scholar
Frydman R., Goldberg M.D., Mechaniczne rynki a świat realny. Wahania cen aktywów, ryzyko i rola państwa, przeł. T. Krzyżanowski, Warszawa 2013.
Google Scholar
Goh E., Contesting Hegemonic Order. China in East Asia, „Security Studies” 2019, vol. 28, nr 3, https://doi.org/10.1080/09636412.2019.1604989.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09636412.2019.1604989
Google Scholar
Golinowski J., Kryzys narracji w nowoczesnej polityce Zachodu, „Teoria Polityki” 2018, nr 2.
Google Scholar
Golinowski J., Państwo wobec darwinistycznych tendencji współczesnej gospodarki, „Transformacje” 2019, nr 1-2 (100-101).
Google Scholar
Guéhenno J.M., The End of the Nation-State, Minnesota 2000.
Google Scholar
Harvey D., Neoliberalizm. Historia katastrofy, przeł. J.P. Listwan, Warszawa 2008.
Google Scholar
Ikenberry G.J., Liberal Leviathan. The Origins, Crisis, and Transformation of the American World Order, Princeton 2011, https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400838196.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400838196
Google Scholar
Ikenberry G.J., The End of Liberal International Order?, „International Affairs” 2018, vol. 94, nr 1, https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iix241.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iix241
Google Scholar
Keohane R.O., Twenty Years of Institutional Liberalism, „International Relations” 2012, vol. 26, nr 2, https://doi.org/10.1177/0047117812438451.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0047117812438451
Google Scholar
Kotz D., The Financial and Economic Crisis of 2008. A Systemic Crisis of Neoliberal Capitalism, „Review of Radical Political Economics” 2009, vol. 41, nr 3, https://doi.org/10.1177/0486613409335093.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0486613409335093
Google Scholar
Krugman P., Arguing with Zombies. Economics, Politics, and the Fight for a Better Future, New York 2020.
Google Scholar
Kukliński A., Megaspaces of the XXI Century. A Problem-Oriented Study, [w:] Reconfiguration of the Global Scene and the Megaspaces of the XXI Century, red. P. Artymowska, A. Kukliński, P. Żuber, Warsaw 2012.
Google Scholar
Luttwak L., From Geopolitics to Geo-economics. Logic of Conflict, Grammar of Commerce, „National Interest” 1990, nr 20.
Google Scholar
Mahbubani K., The Great Convergence. Asia, the West, and the Logic of One World, New York 2013.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.37513/ciar.v6i2.436
Google Scholar
Mahbubani K., The New Asian Hemisphere. The Irresistible Shift of Global Power to the East, New York 2008.
Google Scholar
Mahmoo M., Global Debt Crisis. Challenging Times Ahead, „The Financial Express” 2021, 17 IV, [online] https://thefinancialexpress.com.bd/views/global-debt-crisis-challengingtimes-ahead-16192435559.
Google Scholar
Mavelli L., Neoliberalism as Religion. Sacralization of the Market and Post-truth Politics, „International Political Sociology” 2020, vol. 14, nr 1, https://doi.org/10.1093/ips/olz021.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ips/olz021
Google Scholar
Nye J.S., What Really Matters in the Sino-American Competition?, Project Syndicate, 6 XII
Google Scholar
, [online] https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/us-china-competition-technology-alliances-by-joseph-s-nye-2021-12.
Google Scholar
O’Rourke L.A., Covert Calamities. American-Backed Covert Regime Changes and Civil War, „Canadian Foreign Policy Journal” 2017, vol. 23, nr 3, https://doi.org/10.1080/1192642 2.2017.1359643
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/11926422.2017.1359643
Google Scholar
Orrell D., Economyths. How the Science of Complex Systems is Transforming Economic Thought, London 2010.
Google Scholar
Overbeek H., Apeldoorn B. van, Neoliberalism in Crisis, Basingstoke 2012, https://doi.org/ 10.1057/9781137002471.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137002471
Google Scholar
Overeem P., Compromise, Value Pluralism, and Democratic Liberalism, [w:] Compromise and Disagreement in Contemporary Political Theory, red. C.F. Rostbøll, T. Scavenius, New York 2017, https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315317823-8.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315317823-8
Google Scholar
Pandora Papers. Biggest Ever Leak of Offshore Data Exposes Financial Secrets of Rich and Powerful, „The Guardian” 2021, 3 X, [online] https://www.theguardian.com/news/2021/oct/03/pandora-papers-biggest-ever-leak-of-offshore-data-exposes-financial-secrets-ofrich-and-powerful.
Google Scholar
Robinson W.I., The Great Recession of 2008 and the Continuing Crisis. A Global Capitalism Perspective, „International Review of Modern Sociology” 2012, vol. 38, nr 2.
Google Scholar
Rodrik D., Beware Economists Bearing Policy Paradigms, Project Syndicate, 11 V 2021, [online] https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/economic-policy-must-abandon-universal-paradigms-by-dani-rodrik-2021-05?barrier=accesspaylog.
Google Scholar
Rodrik D., Goodbye Washington Consensus, Hello Washington Confusion? A Review of the “World Bank’s Economic Growth in the 1990s. Learning from a Decade of Reform”, „Journal of Economic Literature” 2006, vol. 44, nr 4, https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.44.4.973.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.44.4.973
Google Scholar
Rodrik D., Industrial Policy, Innovation and Global Rules, „The Financial Express” 2020, 30 XI, [online] https://thefinancialexpress.com.bd/views/industrial-policy-innovationand-global-rules-1606746257.
Google Scholar
Rodrik D., Populism and the Economics of Globalization, „Journal of International Business Policy” 2018, vol. 1, https://doi.org/10.1057/s42214-018-0001-4.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s42214-018-0001-4
Google Scholar
Rodrik D., Rządy ekonomii, przeł. G. Kulesza, Warszawa 2019.
Google Scholar
Sachs J.D., We Don’t Need the G7, Project Syndicate, 16 VI 2021, [online] https://www.projectsyndicate.org/commentary/g7-has-become-obsolete-and-ineffective-by-jeffrey-d-sachs-2021-06?barrier=accesspaylog.
Google Scholar
Schumpeter J.A., Kapitalizm. Socjalizm. Demokracja, przeł. M. Rusiński, Warszawa 1995.
Google Scholar
Stiglitz J., Wizja sprawiedliwej globalizacji. Propozycje usprawnień, przeł. A. Szeworski, Warszawa 2007.
Google Scholar
Streeck W., Taking Capitalism Seriously. Towards an Institutionalist Approach to Contemporary Political Economy, ,,Socio-Economic Review” 2011, vol. 9, nr 1, https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwq028.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwq028
Google Scholar
Szymański W., Niepewność i niestabilność gospodarcza. Gwałtowny wzrost i co dalej?, Warszawa 2011.
Google Scholar
Tansel C.B., Authoritarian Neoliberalism. Towards a New Research Agenda, [w:] States of Discipline. Authoritarian Neoliberalism and the Contested Reproduction of Capitalist Order, red. C.B. Tansel, London 2017.
Google Scholar
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
