Wzrost zastępuje cykliczność – wpływ powstania ekonomii klasycznej na rozwój myśli politycznej
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.22.2025.99.01Keywords:
commerce society, classical economics, liberal meliorism, idea of progress, republicanismAbstract
GROWTH REPLACES CYCLICALITY – THE IMPACT OF THE EMERGENCE OF CLASSICAL ECONOMICS ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF POLITICAL THOUGHT
This article analyses impact of early political economy on evolution of political thought in Europe, tracing writings of David Hume and Josiah Tucker especially. Their economic theories goes to overcoming an old republican tradition of political thought. In republican thought civil virtue was fundamental for the Republic and pursuit of wealth taken as destructive for virtue. So, the main consequence of emergence of political economy was abandoning virtue – wealth contradiction. Wealth was no longer destructive for virtues (especially military ones) and became factor creating good manners, developing arts and sciences and, at the same time, backing military strenght Recognition of possibilities of economic growth by political economist paved the way to neglect the difference, important earlier, between Republic and Monarchy. In political economists’ opinion, Commerce Society thrives in different nations, having different political systems, in all produces wealth, emergence of arts and sciences and reduces social conflicts. Thus, in different political systems economic growth similarly creates more security and freedom. In consequence the main aim of political thought became not stability, but growth.
Downloads
References
Angehrn E., Filozofia dziejów, przeł. J. Marzęcki, Kęty 2007.
Arystoteles, Polityka, przeł. L. Piotrowicz, Wrocław 1953.
Aspromourgos T., On the Origins of Classical Economics: Distribution and Value from William Petty to Adam Smith, London–New York 2011.
Baron H., The Crisis of the Early Italian Renaissance: Civic Humanism and Republican Libert in an Age of Classicissm and Tyranny, Princeton 1966.
Berdell J.F., The Present Relevance of Hume’s Open-Economy Monetary Dynamics, „Economic Journal” 1995, vol. 105, no. 432, s. 1205-1217. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2235412
Blaug M., Teoria ekonomii ujęcie retrospektywne, przeł. I. Budzyńska i in., Warszawa 2000.
Burke P., Tacitism, Scepticism, and Reason of State, [w:] The Cambridge History of Political Thought 1450-1700, red. J.H. Burns, M. Goldie, Cambridge 2006, s. 483-484.
Bury J.B., Idea of Progress: An Inquiry into its Origin and Growth, London 1920.
Cabrini A.M., Machiavelli’s Florentine Histories, [w:] The Cambridge Companion to Machiavelli, red. J.M. Najemy, Cambridge 2010, s. 123-142. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL9780521861250.009
The Cambridge Companion to the Scottish Enightenment, red. A. Broadie, C. Smith, wyd. 2, Cambridge 2019.
Cantillon R., Ogólne rozważania nad naturalnymi prawami handlu (Essai sur la nature du commerce en general), red. przekładu W. Zawadzki, Warszawa 1938.
Clark G., Pożegnanie z jałmużną. Krótka historia gospodarcza świata, przeł. J. Lang, Poznań 2014.
Clark W.E., Josiah Tucker Economist: A Study in the History of Economics, New York 1903. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7312/clar91712
Coats A.W., Changing Attitudes to Labour in the Mid-Eighteenth Century, „Economic History Review” 1958, vol. 11, no. 1, s. 35-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0289.1958.tb01626.x
Davis R., The Rise of Protection in England, 1689-1786, „Economic History Review” 1966, vol. 19, no. 2, s. 306-317. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0289.1966.tb00975.x
Delvaille J., Essai sur l’histoire de l’idee de progres jusqu’a la fin du XVIII siecle, Paris 1910.
Gładziuk N., Druga Babel. Antynomie siedemnastowiecznej angielskiej myśli politycznej, Warszawa 2005.
Grafton A., Humanism and Political Theory, [w:] The Cambridge History of Political Thought 1450-1700, red. J.H. Burns, M. Goldie, Cambridge 2008, s. 92-29.
Gray J., Liberalizm, przeł. R. Dziubecka, Kraków 1994.
Grzybek D., Handel i pokój. Geneza i ewolucja liberalnego pacyfizmu, Kraków 2015.
Grzybek D., Kwestia płacy roboczej w klasycznej ekonomii politycznej, Kraków 2018.
Harley C.K., British and European Industrialization, [w:] The Cambridge History of Capitalism, red. L. Nealand, J.G. Williamson, vol. 1, The Rise of Capitalism: Fron Ancient Origin to 1848, Cambridge 2015.
Hill Ch., The World Turned Upside Down: Radical Ideas during the English Revolution, London 2019.
Hirschman A.O., Namiętności i interesy. U intelektualnych źródeł kapitalizmu, przeł. I. Topińska, M. Kochanowicz, Kraków 1997.
Hont I., Jealousy of Trade: International Competition and the Nation-State in Historical Perspective, Cambridge (Mass.)–London 2010.
Hume D., The Philosophical Works of David Hume, vol. 3, Essays, Moral, Political, and Literary, Edinburgh 1826.
Hutchison T.W., Before Adam Smith: The Emergence of Political Economy 1662-1776, Cambridge (Mass.) 1990.
Irwin D.A., Against the Tide: An Intellectual History of Free Trade, Princeton 1998.
Landreth H., Colander D.C., Historia myśli ekonomicznej, przeł. A. Szeworski, Warszawa 1998.
Larrere C., Montesquieu on Economics and Commerce, [w:] D.W. Carrithers, M.A. Mosher,
W. Letwin, The Origins of Scientific Economics: English Economic Thought 1660-1776, London–New York 2010.
Lindert P.H., Growing Public: Social Spending and Economic Growth Since the Eighteenth Century, vol. 1, Cambridge 2007.
Lis R., Ku społeczeństwu cywilnemu i bogactwu narodów. Główne koncepcje polityczne i prawne szkockiego Oświecenia, Kraków 2014.
Machiavelli and Republicanism, red. G. Bock, Q. Skinner, M. Viroli, Cambridge 1990.
Machiavelli N., Książę, przeł. C. Nanke, Kęty 2005.
Machiavelli N., Rozważania nad pierwszym dziesięcioksięgiem historii Rzymu Liwiusza, przeł. K. Żaboklicki, Warszawa 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31338/uw.9788323513056
Mason H., Optimism, Progress, and Philosophical History, [w:] M. Goldie, R. Wokler, The Cambridge History of Eighteenth-Century Political Thought, Cambridge 2006, s. 195-217. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521374224.009
Mayer T., David Hume and Monetarism, „Quarterly Journal of Economics” 1980, vol. 95, no. 1, s. 89-101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1885350
McCloskey D.N., Bourgeois Dignity: Why Economics can’t Explain the Modern World, Chicago 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226556666.001.0001
Pietrzyk-Reeves D., Ład Rzeczypospolitej. Polska myśl polityczna XVI wieku a klasyczna tradycja republikańska, Kraków 2012.
Pincus S., 1688 The First Modern Revolution, New Haven–London 2009.
Pincus S., Neither Machiavellian Moment nor Possesive Individualism: Commercial Society and the Defenders of the English Commonwealth, „American Historical Review” 1998, vol. 103, no. 3, s. 705-736. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/ahr/103.3.705
Platon, Państwo, przeł. W. Witwicki, Kęty 2020.
Platon, Prawa, przeł. M. Maykowska, Warszawa 1997.
Pocock J.G.A., The Machiavelian Moment: Florentine Political Thought and the Atlantic Republican Tradition, Princeton–Oxford 2003.
Polibiusz, Dzieje, t. 1, przeł. S. Hamer, Wrocław 2005.
Pomeranz K., The Great Divergence: China, Europe, and the Making of the Modern World Economy, Princeton–Oxford 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691217192
Rahe P.A., Against Throne and Altar: Machiavelli and Political Theory under the English Republic, Cambridge 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511509650
Rahe P.A., Montesquieu and the Logic of Liberty: War, Religion, Commerce, Climate, Terrain, Technology, Uneasiness of Mind, the Spirit of Political Vigilance, and the Foundation of Modern Republic, New Haven–London 2009.
Rahe P.A., Montesquieu’s Science of Politics: Essays on The Spirit of Laws, Lanham 2001.
Rashid S., Adam Smith’s Rise to Fame: A Reexamination of the Evidence, „The Eighteenth Century” 1982, vol. 23, no. 1, s. 64-85.
Robbins C., The Eighteenth-Century Commonwealthman: Studies in the Transition, Development, and Circumstance of English Liberal Thought from the Restoration of Charles II until the War with the Thirteen Colonies, Indianapolis 2004.
Romer D., Makroekonomia dla zaawansowanych, przeł. A. Szeworski, Warszawa 2000.
Rothschild E., Sen A., Adam Smith’s Economics, [w:] The Cambridge Companion to Adam Smith, red. K. Haakonsen, Cambridge 2006, s. 319-365. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521770599.013
Schumpeter J.A., History of Economic Analysis, London 1955.
Semmel B., The Hume-Tucker Debate and Pitt’s Trade Proposals, „Economic Journal” 1965, vol. 75, no. 300, s. 759-790. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2229674
Skinner A.S., Hume’s Principles of Political Economy, [w:] The Cambridge Companion to Hume, red. D.F. Norton, J. Taylor, wyd. 2, Cambrige 2009, s. 381-413. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL9780521859868.012
Skinner Q., Wizje polityki, t. 2, Cnoty renesansowe, przeł. K. Koehler, Warszawa 2020.
Skinner Q., Wolność przed liberalizmem, przeł. A. Czarnecka, Toruń 2013.
Smith A., Badania nad naturą i przyczynami bogactwa narodów, t. 1, przeł. S. Wolff, O. Einfeld, Z. Sadowski, Warszawa 2007.
Thomas P. J., Mercantilism and the East India Trade: An Early Phase of the Protection v. Free Trade Controversy, London 1926.
Truitt Elmslie B., The Convergence Debate Between David Hume and Josiah Tucker, „Journal of Economic Perspectives” 1995, vol. 9, no. 4, s. 207-216. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.9.4.207
Tucker J., Four Tracts on Political and Commercial Subjects, wyd. 2, Glo[u]cester 1774.
Urquhart R., David Hume and Josiah Tucker: Pagan and Christian Political Economy, „History of Economic Ideas” 1995, vol. 3, no. 3, s. 1-33.
Zabieglik S., Wiek doskonalenia. Z filozofii szkockiego Oświecenia, Gdańsk 1997.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
