Jeremy Bentham i rządy graczy w pchełki, czyli rzecz o tym, że nie każdy liberał jest liberalny

Autor

  • Tomasz Tulejski Uniwersytet Łódzki

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.14.2017.48.03

Słowa kluczowe:

Bentham, liberalizm, utylitaryzm

Abstrakt

Jeremy Bentham and the Tiddlywinks Player Rules, That Is About That Not Every Liberal Is Liberal

Jeremy Bentham is one of the most important Anglo‑Saxon political thinkers, jurists, social reformers and founders of utilitarianism. He also deserves a prominent position in the history of democratic ideas. Bentham not only perceived popular rule as a vehicle for the materialisation of his vision of utilitarian society, but he also gave us a detailed picture of the basic institutions of that form of democracy. In this article the Author suggests that Benthamiam political concept is not liberal but radical and also rooted in continental radical philosophy of French Enlightenment. By rejecting classical liberal ideas such as natural rights, law of nature, social contract and limited government he opened the door for the democratic tyranny of mediocrity justified by the victory of equality over liberty.

Pobrania

Statystyki pobrań niedostępne.

Biogram autora

  • Tomasz Tulejski - Uniwersytet Łódzki

    Profesor nadzwyczajny w Katedrze Doktryn Polityczno-Prawnych na Wydziale Prawa i Administracji Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego. Autor m.in.: Od zasady użyteczności do demokracji. Filozofia polityczna Jeremy Benthama (2004), Konserwatyzm bez Boga. Dawida Hume’a wizja społeczeństwa, państwa i prawa (2009).

Bibliografia

Alexander A., Bentham, Rights and Humanity: A Fight in Three Rounds, „Journal of Bentham Studies” 2003, Vol. 6, nr 1, [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.14324/111.2045‑757X.019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14324/111.2045-757X.019

Ben‑Dor O., Constitutional Limits and the Public Sphere. A Critical Study of Bentham’s Constitutionalism, Oxford 2000.

Bentham J., Anti‑Senatica, Northampton 1926, Smith College Studies in History, 11.4.

Bentham J., Deontology. Or, The Science of Morality, London 1834. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oseo/instance.00077236

Bentham J., Economic Writings, New York 1952.

Bentham J., Handbook of Political Fallacies, Baltimore 1952.

Bentham J., The Limits of Jurisprudence Defined, New York 1945.

Bentham J., Of Laws in General, London 1970.

Bentham J., Theory of Fictions, London 1932.

Bentham J., Theory of Legislation, London 1864.

Bentham J., Wprowadzenie do zasad moralności i prawodawstwa, przeł. B. Nawroczyński, Warszawa 1958, Biblioteka Klasyków Filozofii.

Bentham’s Political Thought, red. B. Parekh, New York 1973.

Blackstone W., Commentaries of the Law of England, London 1836.

Blakemore S., Intertextual War. Edmund Burke and the French Revolution in the Writings of Mary Wollstonecraft, Thomas Paine, and James Mackintosh, Madison 1997.

Blamires C., The French Revolution and the Creation of Benthamism, New York 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230227729

Burke E., An Appeal from the New to the Old Whigs, in Consequence of Some Late Discussion in Parliament, London 1791.

Burns J.H., Jeremy Bentham: From Radical Enlightenment to Philosophical Radicalism, „The Bentham Newsletter” 1984, nr 8.

Champs E. de, Enlightenment and Utility. Bentham in French, Bentham in France, Cambridge 2015, Ideas in Context.

Coates W.H., Benthamism, Laissez Faire, and Collectivism, „Journal of the History of Ideas” 1950, Vol. 11, nr 3, [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2707736. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2707736

The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, t. 10: Essays on Ethics, Religion, and Society, London 1969.

Conspiracies and Conspiracy Theory in Early Modern Europe. From the Waldensians to the French Revolution, red. B. Coward, J. Swann, Aldershot 2004.

Crimmins J.E., Bentham on Religion: Atheism and the Secular Society, „Journal of the History of Ideas” 1986, Vol. 47, nr 1, [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2709597. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2709597

Crimmins J.E., Utilitarian Philosophy and Politics. Bentham’s Later Years, New York 2011, Bloomsbury Studies in British Philosophy.

Current Legal Problems, t. 51: 1998. Legal Theory at the End of the Millennium, red. M. Freeman, Oxford 1998.

Dinwiddy J.R., Bentham, Oxford 1989, Past Masters.

English Radicalism, 1550-1850, red. G. Burgess, M. Festenstein, Cambridge 2007.

Enlightenment, Rights and Revolution. Essays in Legal and Social Philosophy, red. N. MacCormick, Z. Bankowski, Aberdeen 1989, Enlightenment, Rights and Revolution, 1.

Goldworth A., Bentham’s Concept of Pleasure: Its Relation to Fictitious Terms, „Ethics” 1972, Vol. 82, nr 4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/291857

Gregory Ch.N., Bentham and the Codifiers, „Harvard Law Review” 1900, Vol. 13, nr 5, [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1323338. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1323338

Halevy É., The Growth of Philosophic Radicalism, przeł. M. Morris, London 1928.

Harrison R., Bentham, London 1999, Arguments of the Philosophers.

Hart H.L.A., Eseje z filozofii prawa, przeł. J. Woleński, Warszawa 2001, Klasycy Filozofii Prawa.

Hart H.L.A., Essays on Bentham. Studies in Jurisprudence and Political Theory, Oxford 1982.

Hart H.L.A., Positivism and the Separation of Law and Morals, „Harvard Law Review” 1958, Vol. 71, nr 4, [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1338225. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1338225

Hayek A.F. von, Konstytucja wolności, przeł. J. Stawiński, Warszawa 2006.

Herzog D., Without Foundations. Justification in Political Theory, Ithaca 1985. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7591/9781501723001

Hume L.J., Bentham and Bureaucracy, Cambridge 1981, Cambridge Studies in the History and Theory of Politics. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511608971

Hume L.J., Jeremy Bentham and the Nineteenth‑Century Revolution in Government, „The Historical Journal” 1967, Vol. 10, nr 3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0018246X00027643

Lives, Liberties and the Public Good. New Essays in Political Theory for Maurice Cranston, red. G. Feaver, F. Rosen, London 1987.

Locke J., Dwa traktaty o rządzie, przeł. Z. Rau, Warszawa 1994, Biblioteka Klasyków Filozofii.

Lyons D., In the Interest of the Governed. A Study in Bentham’s Philosophy of Utility and Law, Oxford 2003.

Mack M., Jeremy Bentham. An Odyssey of Ideas 1748-1792, London 1962.

Mill J.S., O rządzie reprezentatywnym. Poddaństwo kobiet, przeł. G. Czarniecki, M. Chyżyńska, Kraków 1995, Demokracja.

Mill J.S., Utylitaryzm. O wolności, przeł. A. Kurlandzka, Warszawa 1959, Biblioteka Klasyków Filozofii.

Mitchell W.C., Bentham’s Felicific Calculus, „Political Science Quarterly” 1918, Vol. 33, nr 2, [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2141580. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2141580

Monteskiusz, O duchu praw, przeł. T. Boy-Żeleński, Kęty 1997, Biblioteka Europejska.

Palmer P.A., Benthamism in England and America, „The American Political Science Review” 1941, Vol. 35, nr 5, [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1948248. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1948248

Peardon T.P., Bentham’s Ideal Republic, „The Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science” 1951, Vol. 17, nr 2, [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0315489000011907. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/137779

Pocock J.G.A., Barbarism and Religion, t. 1: The Enlightenments of Edward Gibbon, 1737‑1764, Cambridge 1999.

Pratt R.C., The Benthamite Theory of Democracy, „The Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science” 1955, Vol. 21, nr 1, [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/138229. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/138229

Rockow L., Bentham on the Theory of Second Chambers, „The American Political Science Review” 1928, Vol. 22, nr 3, [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1945618. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1945618

Rosen F., Classical Utilitarianism from Hume to Mill, London 2003, Routledge Studies in Ethics and Moral Theory.

Rothbard M.N., Classical Economics. An Austrian Perspective on the History of Economic Thought, Aldershot 1995.

Rousseau J.‑J., Umowa społeczna, przeł. A. Peretiatkowicz, Warszawa 1966.

Schofield P., Bentham. A Guide for the Perplexed, New York 2009.

Schofield P., Jeremy Bentham and the British Intellectual Response to the French Revolution, „Journal of Bentham Studies” 2011, Vol. 13, nr 1, [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.14324/111.2045‑757X.040. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14324/111.2045-757X.040

Schofield P., Jeremy Bentham on Political Corruption, „Current Legal Problems” 1996, Vol. 49, nr 1, [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/clp/49.1.395. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/clp/49.1.395

Schofield P., Political and Religious Radicalism in the Thought of Jeremy Bentham, „History of Political Thought” 1999, Vol. 20, nr 2.

Schofield P., Utility and Democracy. The Political Thought of Jeremy Bentham, Oxford 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198208563.001.0001

Sicker M., Jeremy Bentham on Law and Jurisprudence, „Modern Age” 1978, Vol. 22, nr 3.

Stark W., Liberty and Equality or: Jeremy Bentham as an Economist, „The Economic Journal” 1941, Vol. 51, nr 201, [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2225646. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2225646

Stephen L., The English Utilitarians, London 1900.

Toleration and Its Limits, red. M.S. Williams, J. Waldron, New York 2008, Nomos, 48.

Tulejski T., Od zasady użyteczności do demokracji. Filozofia polityczna Jeremy Benthama, Łódź 2004, Monografie Wydziału Prawa i Administracji UŁ.

Williford M., Bentham on the Rights of Women, „Journal of the History of Ideas” 1975, Vol. 36, nr 1, [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2709019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2709019

Wisner D., The Cult of the Legislator in France, 1750‑1830. A Study in the Political Theology of the French Enlightenment, Oxford 1997, Studies on Voltaire and the Eighteenth Century, 352.

The Works of Jeremy Bentham, Edinburgh 1838‑1843.

Pobrania

Opublikowane

28-06-2017

Numer

Dział

Artykuły

Jak cytować

“Jeremy Bentham I rządy Graczy W pchełki, Czyli Rzecz O Tym, że Nie każdy Liberał Jest Liberalny”. 2017. Politeja 14 (3(48): 35-61. https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.14.2017.48.03.

Podobne artykuły

1-10 z 26

Możesz również Rozpocznij zaawansowane wyszukiwanie podobieństw dla tego artykułu.