Mal(e) Development, (Com)modification, Nationalism and Feminist Consciousness: An Analysis of Arundhati Roy’s Writings
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.13.2016.40.16Słowa kluczowe:
Development, Capitalism, Feminism, Dam buildingAbstrakt
The terms “mal(e)development” and “(com)modification” are coinages that underscore the nexus of the patriarchy, colonialism and capitalism in the Indian context. India has witnessed tremendous development and exploitation of its natural resources in the post‑independence era owing to the aids sponsored by the developed nations. The mal(e) development and (com)modification of India on the western model is masquerading as nation building in the 21st century. Arundhati Roy, the prominent feminist writer‑activist, lays bare this camouflaged maldevelopment and commodification of nature and women. Roy’s concerns are pretty much influenced by eco‑feministic discourse. In post‑independence India, colonialism has resorted to subterfuge, presenting a Western model of development to the developing nations.
Pobrania
Bibliografia
Clarke R.L.W., Louis Althusser “Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses” (1969), at <http://www.rlwclarke.net/courses/LITS3304/2010‑2011/07Althusser,IdeologyandIdeologicalStateApparatuses.pdf>.
Guha R., ‘The Arun Shourie of the Left,’ The Hindu, 26 November 2000, at <http://www.thehindu.com/2000/11/26/stories/13260411.htm>.
Hobgood‑Oster L., ‘Ecofeminism: Historic and International Evolution,’ at <http://www.clas.ufl.edu/users/bron/pdf–christianity/Hobgood‑Oster–Ecofeminism‑International%20Evolution.pdf>.
Khan T.R., ‘“Dam” the Irony for The Greater Common Good: A Critical Cultural Analysis of the Narmada Dam Debate,’ International Journal of Communication, No. 6 (2012), at <http://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/1257/693>.
Lacan J., The Ethics of Psychoanalysis, 1959‑1960, ed. J. Alain‑Miller, trans. by D. Porter. London 1992.
Leech K., ‘The Narmada Dambusters Are Wrong,’ The Guardian, 3 March 2009, at <http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2009/mar/03/india‑narmada‑dams>.
Mander H., ‘Savaged by Tradition,’ Frontline, Vol. 19, No. 24 (2002), at <http://www.frontline.in/static/html/fl1924/stories/20021206003009400.htm>.
McLeod J. (ed.), Beginning Postcolonialism, New Delhi 2006 (Beginnings).
Roy A., ‘Capitalism: A Ghost Story,’ Outlook, 26 March 2012, p. 3, at <http://www.outlookindia.com/magazine/story/capitalism‑a‑ghost‑story/280234>.
Roy A., ‘The Cost of Living,’ Frontline, Vol. 17, No. 3 (2000), at <http://www.frontline.in/static/html/fl1703/17030640.htm>.
Roy A., The God of Small Things, New Delhi 2002.
Roy A., ‘The Greater Common Good,’ Outlook India, 24 May 1999, at <http://www.outlookindia.com/printarticle.aspx?207509>.
Shiva V., ‘Development, Ecology, and Women,’ at <http://faculty.unlv.edu/wjsmith/smithtest/SHIVAwomenDevEcol.pdf>.
Shiva V., Growth = Poverty, Festival of Dangerous Ideas 2013, YouTube, at <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7M3WJQbnHKc>.
Tøllefsen I.B., ‘Ecofeminism, Religion and Nature in an Indian and Global Perspective,’ Alternative Spirituality and Religion Review, Vol. 2, No. 1 (2011), at <http://uit.no/Content/276140/Ecofeminism_Inga_2011.pdf>. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/asrr20112130
Tošić J., ‘Ecocriticism – Interdisciplinary Study of Literature and Environment,’ Working and Living Environmental Protection, Vol. 3, No. 1 (2006), at <http://facta.junis.ni.ac.rs/walep/walep2006/walep2006‑06.pdf>.
Verghese B.G., ‘A Poetic License,’ Outlook India, 5 July 1999, at <http://www.outlookindia.com/printarticle.aspx?207723>.
Waugh P. (ed.), Literary Theory and Criticism. An Oxford Guide, New Delhi 2006.
‘What is the Forest Rights Act about?,’ at <http://www.forestrightsact.com/what‑is‑this‑act‑about>.
Wilson S., ‘Writing Excess: The Poetic Principle of Post‑literary Culture’ in P. Waugh (ed.), Literary Theory and Criticism. An Oxford Guide, New Delhi 2006.
Pobrania
Opublikowane
Numer
Dział
Licencja
Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Użycie niekomercyjne – Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe.
