Similarities and Differences between the Democratization Process in Poland and South Korea in the Late 1980s
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.22.2025.95.03Keywords:
Poland, South Korea, democratization, democratic transition, democratic consolidation, transplacement, negotiationsAbstract
This study aims to compare the democratization process in Poland and South Korea in the late 1980s. Despite their distant geographical and cultural location, the two countries happen to share many similarities regarding their recent history and geopolitics. For this reason, it is beneficial to compare the two in order to find out the main conditions and factors, which contributed to democratic transition in both of them. The study focuses on the ideas of democracy, democratization, and transplacement as the main concepts that define the democratization process in Poland and South Korea. Through the comparison, we find outthat there are many more similarities than differences between the two. We also learn that both economic stagnation and economic prosperity can similarly contribute to forcing authoritarian governments to democratize, yet the same economic factors also very often determine the final results of the process.
Downloads
References
Dahl R.A., On Democracy, New Haven 1998.
Diamond L., Developing Democracy: Towards Consolidation, Baltimore 1999.
Diamond L., Plattner M.F., Chu Yun-han et. al (eds.), Consolidating the Third Wave Democracies: Themes and Perspectives, Baltimore 1997.
Dryzek J.S., Holmes L.T., Post-communist Democratization: Political Discourses Across Thirteen Countries, Cambridge 2002.
Heo Uk, “The Third Wave of Democratization and Economic Performance in Asia: Theory and Application,” Korea Observer, vol. 43, no. 1 (2012), pp. 1-20.
Huntington S.P., The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century, Norman 1991.
Jung Jai Kwan, “Popular Mobilization and Democratization: A Comparative Study of South Korea and Taiwan,” Korea Observer, vol. 42 no. 3 (2011), pp. 377-411.
Kim Sunhyuk, The Politics of Democratization in Korea: The Role of Civil Society, Pittsburgh 2000.
Kozłowski K., Stüwe K. (eds), The Korean Peninsula: Unification Trajectories: Insights from Poland to Germany, Warsaw 2017.
Lee Dong-Yoon., Lee Jaehyon., “Political Crises After Democratization in South Korea and Thailand: Comparative Perspectives of Democratic Consolidation,” Korea Observer, vol. 39 (2008), pp. 121-156.
Lim Jie-Hyun, Global Easts: Remembering, Imagining, Mobilizing, New York 2022.
Linz J.J., Stepan A., Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and Post-communist Europe, Baltimore 1996.
Přibáň J., “Varieties of Transition from Authoritarianism to Democracy,” Annual Review of Law and Social Science, vol. 8 (2012), pp. 105-121.
Przeworski A., Democracy and the Market: Political and Economic Reforms in Eastern Europe and Latin America, Cambridge–New York 1991.
Saxonberg S., “Regime Behavior in 1989: A Comparison of Czechoslovakia, East Germany, Hungary, and Poland,” Problems of Post-communism, vol. 47, no. 4 (2000), pp. 45-58, https://doi.org/10.1080/10758216.2000.11655893.
Schedler A., “What is democratic consolidation?,” Journal of Democracy, vol. 9, no. 2 (1998), pp. 91-107.
Seong Gyeongryung, Political Sociology of Regime Change Korean Politics, Seoul 1995.
Shin Doh Chull., Mass Politics and Culture in Democratizing Korea, Cambridge 1999.
Wakabayashi Masahiro, “Democratization of the Taiwanese and Korean Political Regimes: A Comparative Study,” Developing Economies, vol. 35, no. 4 (1997), pp. 422-439, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-1049.1997.tb00855.x.
Yoon Deokhui, “Pollandeuwa Heonggari gaehyeokui uimiwa sahoejuui hyangbang,” (The Meaning of Reforms and the Future Direction of Socialism in Poland and Hungary) Journal of Korean Social Trend and Perspective, vol. 6 (1989), pp. 70-83.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
