The Institutional Balance: a Janus-faced concept of EU constitutional law

Authors

  • Oleksandr Moskalenko University of Turku

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.13.2016.45.07

Keywords:

Institutional balance, European integration, representative theory, checks and balances, separation of powers theory

Abstract

The concept of institutional balance is an original theory associated with the development of the EU institutional structure. This article offers a critical analysis of the different uses of the concept. While doing that, the article provides representative samples of the ways in which the concept has been used in the processes of the European integration, including its practical implementation by the European Court of Justice. Our argument is that, in its current state, the concept of institutional balance serves both reactive and transformative functions within the EU law. It emphasises the necessity to periodically check and adjust the power distribution architecture in response to new challenges of the EU evolution process. Moreover, it serves as a conceptual vehicle through which different power configurations within the EU context may be both criticized and legitimized.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

PlumX Metrics of this article

Author Biography

Oleksandr Moskalenko, University of Turku

Is a PhD candidate at the Faculty of Law, University of Turku, Finland. His research interests include European Union Law, EU-Ukraine realtions, European Parliament in the EU insitutional system, European Parliament’s role in EU foreign policy. He has published articles in East European Quarterly, Croatian Yearbook of European Law and Policy, Eastern Journal of European Studies, Studia Diplomatica – Brussels Journal of International Relations.

References

Aleinikoff T.A., ‘Constitutional Law in the Age of Balancing’, Yale Law Journal, Vol. 96, No. 5 (1987), at <http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/796529>. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/796529
Google Scholar

Alexy R., Theory of Constitutional Rights, transl. by J. Rivers, Oxford 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2202/1938-2545.1042
Google Scholar

Christiansen Th., ‘The European Union after the Lisbon Treaty: An Elusive “Institutional Balance?”’ in A. Biondi, P. Eeckhout, S. Ripley (eds.), EU Law after Lisbon, Oxford 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199644322.003.0011
Google Scholar

Conway G., ‘Recovering a Separation of Powers in the European Union’, European Law Journal, Vol. 17, No. 3 (2011), at <http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2011.00552.x>. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2011.00552.x
Google Scholar

Corbett R., Vigo Í.M. de, Report on the Treaty of Lisbon (European Parliament, Committee on Constitutional Affairs, A6-0013/2008), Jan. 29, 2008.
Google Scholar

Craig P., Búrca G. de, The Evolution of EU Law, Oxford 1999.
Google Scholar

Curtin D., Executive Power in the European Union. Law, Practices, and the Living Constitution, Oxford 2009 (The Collected Courses of the Academy of European Law).
Google Scholar

Curtin D., ‘The Constitutional Structure of the Union: A Europe of Bits and Pieces’, Common Market Law Review, Vol. 30, No. 1 (1993).
Google Scholar

Devuyst Yu., ‘The European Union’s Institutional Balance after the Treaty of Lisbon: “Community Method” and “Democratic Deficit” Reassessed’, Georgetown Journal of International Law, Vol. 39, No. 2 (2008).
Google Scholar

Douglas-Scott S., Constitutional Law of the European Union, Harlow 2002.
Google Scholar

Fritzsche A., ‘Discretion, Scope of Judicial Review and Institutional Balance in European Law’, Common Market Law Review, Vol. 47, No. 2 (2010).
Google Scholar

Georgopoulos Th., ‘The “Checks and Balances” Doctrine in Member States as a Rule of EC Law: The Cases of France and Germany’, European Law Journal, Vol. 9, No. 5 (2003), at <http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1468-0386.2003.00191.x>. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1468-0386.2003.00191.x
Google Scholar

Guillermin G., ‘Le principe de l’équilibre dans la jurisprudence de CJCE’, Journal du Droit International, Vol. 19, No. 2 (1992).
Google Scholar

Hamilton A., Madison J., Jay J., The Federalist Papers, New York 1961. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674332133
Google Scholar

Hoffmann L., ‘Constitutional Expectations and the European Union: The Issue of Executive Opacity in the Union’s Continuous Constitutionalisation Process’, at <http://www.uaces.org/documents/papers/1102/hoffmann.pdf>.
Google Scholar

Jacqué J.-P., ‘The Principle of Institutional Balance’, Common Market Law Review, Vol. 41, No. 2 (2004).
Google Scholar

Kreher A., ‘Agencies in the European Community: A Step towards Administrative Integration of Europe’, Journal of European Public Policy, Vol. 4, No. 2 (1997). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13501769709696340
Google Scholar

Lang J.T., Gallagher E., ‘The Commission, the “Community Method”, and the Smaller Member States’, Fordham International Law Journal, Vol. 29, No. 5 (2006).
Google Scholar

Lenaerts K., Verhoeven A., ‘Institutional Balance as a Guarantee for Democracy in EU Governance’ in C. Joerges, R. Dehousse (eds.), Good Governance in Europe’s Integrated Market, Oxford 2002 (Collected Courses of the Academy of European Law, 11/2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199246083.003.0002
Google Scholar

Magnette P., ‘La grande transformation de l’Europe’ in P. Magnette, E. Remacle (eds.), Le nouveau modèle européen, Vol. 1: Institutions et gouvernance, Bruxelles 2000 (Études Européennes).
Google Scholar

Menon A., Weatherill S., Democratic Politics in a Globalising World. Supranationalism and Legitimacy in the European Union, London 2007 (LSE Law, Society and Economy Working Papers, 13/2007). DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1021218
Google Scholar

Opinion of Advocate General Jääskinen delivered on 12 September 2013 (1), Case C-270/12 United Kingdom v European Parliament and Council of the European Union, at <http://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf ?docid=140965&doclang=EN>.
Google Scholar

Pedler R., Schaefer G. (eds.), Shaping European Law and Policy. The Role of Committees and Comitology in the Political Process, Maastricht 1996.
Google Scholar

Peers S., Costa M., ‘Accountability for Delegated and Implementing Acts after the Treaty of Lisbon’, European Law Journal, Vol. 18, No. 3 (2012), at <http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2012.00607.x>. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2012.00607.x
Google Scholar

Pescatore P., ‘Les travaux du “groupe juridique” dans la négociation des traités de Rome’, Studia Diplomatica, Vol. 34, No. 168 (1981).
Google Scholar

Petersmann E.-U., ‘Proposals for a New Constitution for the European Union: Building Blocks for a Constitutional Theory and Constitutional Law of the EU’, Common Market Law Review, Vol. 32, No. 5 (1995).
Google Scholar

Prechal S., ‘Institutional Balance: A Fragile Principle with Uncertain Content’ in T. Heukels, N. Blokker, M. Brus (eds.), The European Union after Amsterdam. A Legal Analysis, The Hague 1998.
Google Scholar

Prodi R., ‘The State of the Union in 2001, address before the European Parliament’, Bulletin of the European Union, No. 1/2 (2001).
Google Scholar

Rosas A., Armati L., EU Constitutional Law. An Introduction, Oxford 2010.
Google Scholar

Rossi L.S., ‘A New Inter-Institutional Balance: Supranational vs. Intergovernmental Method after the Lisbon Treaty’, Global Jean Monnet-ECSA WORLD Conference “The European Union after the Treaty of Lisbon”, Brussels, 25-26 May 2010, at <http://www.astrid-online.it/static/upload/protected/Ross/Rossi-Global-Jean-Monnet-paper.pdf>.
Google Scholar

Sbragia A., ‘The European Community: A Balancing Act’, Publius: The Journal of Federalism, Vol. 23, No. 3 (1993). DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3330840
Google Scholar

‘Schuman Declaration and the Birth of Europe. Speech of 9 May 1950’, Schuman Project, at <http://www.schuman.info>.
Google Scholar

Shapiro D., Federalism. A Dialogue, Evanston 1995.
Google Scholar

Smismans S., ‘Institutional Balance as Interest Representation. Some Reflections on Lenaerts and Verhoeven’ in C. Joerges, R. Dehousse (eds.), Good Governance in Europe’s Integrated Market, Oxford 2002 (Collected Courses of the Academy of European Law, 11/2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199246083.003.0003
Google Scholar

Thody Ph., A Historical Introduction to the European Union, London 1997.
Google Scholar

Tugendhat Ch., Making Sense of Europe, London 1986.
Google Scholar

Verhoeven A., The European Union in Search of a Democratic and Constitutional Theory, The Hague 2002 (European Monographs, 38).
Google Scholar

Wallace H., ‘The Institutional Setting: Five Variations on a Theme’ in H. Wallace, W. Wallace (eds.), Policy-Making in the European Union, Oxford 2000 (The New European Union Series).
Google Scholar

Warleigh A. (ed.), Understanding European Union Institutions, London 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203470909
Google Scholar

Downloads

Published

2016-12-17

How to Cite

Moskalenko, Oleksandr. 2016. “The Institutional Balance: a Janus-Faced Concept of EU Constitutional Law”. Politeja 13 (45):125-43. https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.13.2016.45.07.

Issue

Section

Articles