The Problem of Universal Values and Intercultural Space – New /Old Predicament of Anthropology
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.13.2016.44.09Słowa kluczowe:
universalism vs. relativism, universal values, translating culturesAbstrakt
The discussion over universal vs. cultural relative values hits the core of anthropological knowledge. Although cultural relativism served as an almost irrefutable basis for anthropological practice of understanding the Other, several factors of a recent origin have started to undermine the obvious. The “Arab spring,” the “Occupy” movements, the debate over female circumcision that attracts global attention, local uses of the relativistic arguments in political contexts and the debates over universality of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, all of these trigger a new discourse on the universality of human values. Universality turns our attention to the problem of translatability of cultures – without an assumption that there is shared, intercultural space and a certain level of commensurability between cultures, any rapport would be impossible. The translation problem directs us toward a discussion on cross-cultural communication and the universality of values and their hierarchies. The discussion has showed that values are not constant residua within intercultural space but rather they are part of an interpretive activity of the participants of a cross-cultural interaction.
Pobrania
Bibliografia
Barber, Benjamin R. 2007: Dżihad kontra McŚwiat. (Spectrum.) Transl. by Hanna Jankowska. Warszawa: Muza.
Bhabha, Homi K. 2010: Miejsca kultury. (Cultura.) Transl. by Tomasz Dobrogoszcz. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.
D’Andrade, Roy 2008: A Study of Personal and Cultural Values American, Japanese, and Vietnamese. (Culture, Mind, and Society.) New York/Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Davidson, Donald 1989: “The Myth of the Subjective,” in: Michael Krausz (ed.): Relativism. Interpretation and Confrontation. Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press, pp. 159-172.
Eisenstadt, S.N. 2000: “Multiple Modernities,” Daedalus 129(1): 1–29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298000290031201
Eriksen, Thomas Hylland 2006: Engaging Anthropology. The Case for a Public Presence. Oxford/ New York: Berg.
Evans-Pritchard, Edward Evan 1965: Theories of Primitive Religion. (Sir D. Owen Evans Lectures.) Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Geertz, Clifford 1983: Local Knowledge. Further Essays in Interpretive Anthropology. New York: Basic Books.
Gershenhorn, Jerry 2004: Melville J. Herskovits And the Racial Politics of Knowledge. (Critical Studies in the History of Anthropology.) Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Habermas, Jürgen 2004: Działanie komunikacyjne i detranscendentalizacja rozumu. (Terminus. 37.) Transl. by Wanda Lipnik. Warszawa: Oficyna Naukowa.
Hermeking, M. 2007: “Global Internet Usage, Web Site Design, and Cultural Communication Preferences: Contributions from Cross-Cultural Marketing and Advertising Research,” in: Kirk St. Amant (ed.): Linguistic and Cultural Online Communication Issues in the Global Age. Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference, pp. 160–176. DOI: 10.4018/978-1-59904-213-8.ch011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59904-213-8.ch011
Huntington, Samuel P. 2008: Zderzenie cywilizacji i nowy kształt ładu światowego. (Spectrum.) Transl. by Hanna Jankowska. Warszawa: Muza.
Kluckhohn, Clyde 1949: Mirror for Man. The Relation of Anthropology to Modern Life. New York: Whittlesey House.
Kuligowski, Paweł 2011: Przyszłość jest katastrofą. Szkice z filozofii kultury. Wrocław: Atut.
Leach, Edmund R. 1973: “Ourselves and Others,” Times Literary Supplement July 6: 771-772.
Leach, Edmund R. 1982: Social Anthropology. New York: Oxford University Press.
Lull, James 2001: “Superculture for the Communication Age,” in: Idem (ed.): Culture in the Communication Age. (Comedia.) London: Routledge, pp. 132–163.
Peacock, James L. 2001: The Anthropological Lens. Harsh Light, Soft Focus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139164924
Pieterse, Jan Nederveen 2009: Globalization and Culture. Global Mélange. (Globalization.) Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield.
Salzmann, Zdeněk 2012: “Cross-Cultural (Interethnic) Communication Reconsidered,” Studia Ethnologica Pragensia 1: 29–37.
Schwartz, Shalom H.; Bardi, Anat 2001: “Value Hierarchies Across Cultures Taking a Similarities Perspective,” Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 32(3): 268–290. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022101032003002
Schweizer, Thomas 1998: “Epistemology. The Nature and Validation of Anthropological Knowledge,” in: H. Russell Bernard (ed.): Handbook of Methods in Cultural Anthropology.
Walnut Creek, Calif.: AltaMira Press, pp. 39-88.
Shin, Sarah 2011: Slavoj Žižek at Occupy Wall Street: “We Are Not Dreamers, We Are the Awakening from a Dream Which Is Turning into a Nightmare.” Versobooks.com. Available under <http://www.versobooks.com/blogs/736-slavoj-zizek-at-occupy-wall-street-we-are-notdreamers-we-are-the-awakening-from-a-dream-which-is-turning-into-a-nightmare> (accessed on April 17, 2013).
Tambiah, Stanley J. 1990: Magic, Science and Religion and the Scope of Rationality. (Lewis Henry Morgan Lectures.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Torop, Peeter 2000: “Intersemiosis and Intersemiotic Translation,” European Journal for Semiotic Studies 12(1): 71–100.
Tyler, Stephen A. 1987: The Unspeakable. Discourse, Dialogue, and Rhetoric in the Postmodern World. (Rhetoric of the Human Sciences.) Madison, Wis.: University of Wisconsin Press.
Pobrania
Opublikowane
Numer
Dział
Licencja

Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Użycie niekomercyjne – Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe.