Colin Bird on Libertarianism

A Critique

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.21.2024.90.05

Keywords:

libertarianism, self-ownership, rights, utilitarianism, inviolability, redistribution

Abstract

In this article, I delve into Colin Bird’s critical evaluation of libertarianism. Bird positions this strand within his broader framework of “liberal individualism,” and he contends that libertarianism, as a prime exemplar of liberal individualism, is inherently self-contradictory because of the perceived tension between self-ownership and individual inviolability. Employing logical and comparative analyses, this research rigorously examines the accuracy of Bird’s reconstruction and interpretation of libertarianism, while also assessing the validity of his assertion that libertarianism harbours internal contradictions. The findings suggest that Bird’s argument does not hold primarily due to misinterpreting the core tenets of libertarianism.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Paweł Nowakowski, University of Wrocław, Poland

    Assistant Professor at the Institute of Political Science, the University of Wrocław. His research interests cover libertarianism, human dignity, philosophy of rights and political culture.

References

Bird C., The Myth of Liberal Individualism, Cambridge 1999.

Christmas B., “Force and Coercion,” in M. Zwolinski, B. Ferguson (eds), The Routledge Companion to Libertarianism, London–New York 2022, https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367814243-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367814243-13

Dominiak Ł., Wysocki I., “The Anarcho-Capitalist Case Against the State as a Challenge to the Minarchist Libertarians,” Roczniki Filozoficzne, vol. 70, no. 2 (2022), pp. 53-69, https://doi.org/10.18290/rf2202.4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18290/rf2202.4

Dominiak Ł., Wysocki I., “Libertarianism, Defense of Property, and Absolute Rights,” Analiza i Egzystencja, vol. 61 (2023), pp. 5-26, https://doi.org/10.18276/aie.2023.61-01. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18276/aie.2023.61-01

Huemer M., “Is There a Right to Own a Gun?,” Social Theory and Practice, vol. 29, no. 2 (2003), pp. 297-324, https://doi.org/10.5840/soctheorpract200329215. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/soctheorpract200329215

Kramer M.H., Torture and Moral Integrity, Oxford 2004.

Long R.T., Machan T.R. (eds), Anarchism/Minarchism: Is a Government Part of a Free Country?, Ashgate 2008.

Nozick R., Anarchy, State, and Utopia, Oxford–Cambridge 1999.

Rothbard M.N., The Ethics of Liberty, New York–London 1998.

Rothbard M.N., For a New Liberty: The Libertarian Manifesto, Auburn 2006.

Sher G., [Review of The Myth of Liberal Individualism, by C. Bird] Mind, vol. 110, no. 437 (2001).

Tomasi J., Free Market Fairness, Princeton–Oxford 2012, https://doi.org/10.23943/princeton/9780691144467.001.0001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23943/princeton/9780691144467.003.0008

Vallentyne P., “Libertarisme, propriété de soi et homicide consensuel,” Revue Philosophique de Louvain, vol. 101, no. 1 (2003), pp. 5-25, https://doi.org/10.2143/RPL.101.1.718. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2143/RPL.101.1.718

Zwolinski M., Tomasi J., The Individualists: Radicals, Reactionaries, and the Struggle for the Soul of Libertarianism, Princeton–Oxford 2023, https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691241043. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691241043

Downloads

Published

24-11-2024

Issue

Section

Political Theory

How to Cite

“Colin Bird on Libertarianism : A Critique”. 2024. Politeja 21 (3(90): 105-19. https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.21.2024.90.05.

Similar Articles

1-10 of 115

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.