Ancient Traditions and Modern Challenges: South Asian Studies Today
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.13.2016.40.02Słowa kluczowe:
Indology, South Asia, Sanskrit, HinduismAbstrakt
In order to show the mutual importance and usefulness of classical and modern Indology to each other, the author presents a series of cases, where ancient things are present (and often reinterpreted and modified) in modern India, in fields such as religion and philosophy, social hierarchy, popular entertainment, language and linguistics and traditions of scholarship.
Pobrania
Bibliografia
Aalto P., Oriental Studies in Finland 1828‑1918, Helsinki 1971 (The History of Learning and Science in Finland 1828‑1918).
Dumont L., Homo hierarchicus. The Caste System and its Implications, London–Chicago 1970.
Halbfass W., India and Europe. An Essay in Understanding, Albany, N.Y. 1988.
Hock H.H., ‘Spoken Sanskrit in Uttar Pradesh – a Sociolinguistic Profile,’ Journal of Orientology. Lokaprajñā, Vol. 2: Prof. N.S. Rāmānuja Tātācārya Felicitation Volume (1988).
Irwin R., For Lust of Knowing. The Orientalists and their Enemies, London 2007.
Karttunen K., ‘Pilgrimage as Business in Traditional India’ in R. Gothóni (ed.), Pilgrims and Travellers in Search of the Holy, Oxford 2010.
Karttunen K., ‘Some Thoughts about Edward Said, Hindutva, and Western Indology’ in I. Milewska (ed.), Future of Indology, Kraków 2008 (Cracow Indological Studies, 10).
Karttunen K., ‘South Asian Studies in Finland,’ Newsletter of the International Association of Sanskrit Studies, No. 7 (2002).
Said E.W., Orientalism, London 1985.
Tenhunen S., ‘Mobile Technology in the Village: ICTs, Culture, and Social Logistics in India, ’Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, Vol. 14, No. 3 (2008), at <http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467‑9655.2008.00515.x>. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9655.2008.00515.x
Pobrania
Opublikowane
Numer
Dział
Licencja

Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Użycie niekomercyjne – Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe.