Epistemologia przekładu
Polemika z Edwardem Balcerzanem
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.12797/MOaP.32.2026.72.01Mots-clés :
epistemology of translation, epistemic translational communication, typology of textual structures, polisystem, intertextualityRésumé
THE EPISTEMOLOGY OF TRANSLATION: A POLEMIC WITH EDWARD BALCERZAN
This article is a response to E. Balcerzan’s [2022] proposal for an internal epistemology of literary translation. While valuable due to its original theoretical perspective, the author simultaneously considers it detached from current trends in translation studies. Balcerzan draws exclusively on the concepts and tools of structuralism, which is currently an insufficient approach. The author disputes the scholar’s identitarian definition of translation as a “re-edition of the original,” which prevents it from being understood as an epistemic transformation. She also proposes expanding his typology of textual structures using the concepts of polysystems [Even-Zohar 1978; 1990] and intertextual tools [Genette 1982].
Téléchargements
Références
Alves, F., Jakobsen, A., red. (2021), The Routledge Handbook of Translation and Cognition, Routledge, London. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315178127
View in Google Scholar
Bachmann-Medick, D. (2006/2016), Cultural Turns. Nowe kierunki w naukach o kulturze, Oficyna Naukowa, Warszawa. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110402988
View in Google Scholar
Baker, M. (2006/2018), Translation and Conflict: A Narrative Account, Routledge, London–New York. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429438240
View in Google Scholar
Balcerzan, E. (2022), „Epistemologia przekładu”, Przekładaniec. 45: 7-18 (przedruk w: Balcerzan, E. (2025), Innymi słowami. Umiejętności tłumacza. Wybór prac, red. Ewa Rajewska, Wydawnictwo UJ, Kraków). DOI: https://doi.org/10.4467/16891864PC.22.008.17169
View in Google Scholar
Bartmiński, J., Bartmińska-Niebrzegowska, S. (2009), Tekstologia, PWN, Warszawa.
View in Google Scholar
Basalamah, S. (2019), „Towards a Philosophy of Translation”, [w:] J. Piers Rawling, Philip Wilson, The Routledge Handbook of Translation and Philosophy, Routledge, London. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315678481-30
View in Google Scholar
Basalamah, S. (2023), „Philosophical Approaches”, [w:] Reine Meylaerts, Kobus Marais, red., The Routledge Handbook of Translation Theory and Concepts, Routledge, London. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003161448-11
View in Google Scholar
Bennett, K. (2024), „Epistemic Translation: Towards an Ecology of Knowledges”, Perspectives: Studies of Translation Theory and Practice. 34(1): 16-31. https://doi.org/10.1080/0907676X.2023.2294123. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0907676X.2023.2294123
View in Google Scholar
Blumczynski, P. (2016), Ubiquitous Translation, Routledge, London. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315646480
View in Google Scholar
Blumczynski, P. (2023), Experiencing Translationality. Material and Metaphorical Journeys, Routledge, London. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003382201
View in Google Scholar
Blumczynski, P., Hassani, G. (2019), „Towards a Meta-Theoretical Model for Translation”, Target. 31(3): 328-351. https://doi.org/10.1075/target.17031.blu. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/target.17031.blu
View in Google Scholar
Bukowski, P., Heydel, M., red. (2009), Współczesne teorie przekładu. Antologia, Znak, Kraków.
View in Google Scholar
Chesterman, A. (2001), „Proposal for a Hieronymic Oath”, The Translator. 7: 139-154. https://doi.org/10.1080/13556509.2001.10799097. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13556509.2001.10799097
View in Google Scholar
Chesterman, A. (2018), „Translation Ethics”, [w:] Lieven D’hulst, Yves Gambier, red. A History of Modern Translation Knowledge: Sources, Concepts, Effects, Benjamins Translation Library, no. 142, John Benjamins, Amsterdam. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.142.62che
View in Google Scholar
Chesterman, A. (2020), „Virtue Ethics in Translation”, [w:] Kaisa Koskinen, Nike K. Pokorn, red. The Routledge Handbook of Translation and Ethics, Routledge, London. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003127970-3
View in Google Scholar
Chesterman, A. (2021), „Translation, Epistemology and Cognition”, [w:] Fabio Alves, Arnt Lykke Jakobsen, red. The Routledge Handbook of Translation and Cognition, Routledge, London–New York. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315178127-3
View in Google Scholar
Dobrzyńska, T. (2001), „Od niespójności do (super)koherencji. Rola metatekstu w utworze literackim”, [w:] Anna Pajdzińska, Ryszard Tokarski, red. Semantyka tekstu artystycznego, Wydawnictwo UMCS, Lublin.
View in Google Scholar
Even-Zohar, I. (1978), Papers in Historical Poetics, Porter Institute for Poetics and Semiotics, Tel Awiw.
View in Google Scholar
Even-Zohar, I. (1990), „The Position of Translated Literature within the Literary Polysystem”, Polysystem Studies. Poetics Today. 11(1): 45-51. https://www.jstor.org/stable/i303085. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1772668
View in Google Scholar
Even-Zohar, I. (2005), „Polysystem Theory (Revised)”, Papers in Culture Research. 9(1): 38-49. http://www.tau.ac.il/-itamarez/works/books/EZ-CR-2005.pdf.
View in Google Scholar
Fedorov, A. (1953), Vvedenije v teoriju perevoda, Izdatelstvo literatury na inostrannykh iazykakh, Moskwa.
View in Google Scholar
Genette, G. (1982), Palimpsestes: La littérature au second degré, Seuil, Paris.
View in Google Scholar
Halverson, S. (2014), Reconceptualizing Translation, Routledge, London.
View in Google Scholar
Hejwowski, K. (2004), Kognitywno-komunikacyjna teoria przekładu, PWN, Warszawa.
View in Google Scholar
Jarniewicz, J. (2002), „Tłumacz jako twórca kanonu”, [w:] Roman Lewicki, red. Przekład. Język. Kultura, Wydawnictwo UMCS, Lublin.
View in Google Scholar
Kokkola, S. (2024), „The Invisible Ubiquity of Philosophy in Translation Studies: Towards a Re-articulation of the Discipline’s Relationship with Philosophy”, Translation Studies. 17: 216-233. https://doi.org/10.1080/14781700.2023.2270579. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14781700.2023.2270579
View in Google Scholar
Leal, A., Wilson, P. (2023), „A Tale of Two Disciplines? Philosophy in/on Translation”, Perspectives. 31(1): 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/0907676X.2023.2148984. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0907676X.2023.2148984
View in Google Scholar
Małczyński, J., Tańczuk, R., red. (2022), „Wprowadzenie”, [w:] Prace Kulturoznawcze. 26(2) Cnoty epistemiczne: 9-11. https://doi.org/10.19195/0860-6668.26.2.1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19195/0860-6668.26.2.1
View in Google Scholar
Marais, K. (2014), Translation Theory and Development Studies: A Complexity Theory Approach, Routledge, London. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203768280
View in Google Scholar
Marais, K., Meylaerts, R., red. (2019), Complexity Thinking in Translation Studies: Methodological Considerations, Routledge, New York. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203702017
View in Google Scholar
Marais, K., Meylaerts, R., red. (2022), Exploring the Implications of Complexity Thinking for Translation Studies, Routledge, New York. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003105114
View in Google Scholar
Marais, K., Meylaerts, R., red. (2023), The Routledge Handbook of Translation Theory and Concepts, Routledge, London. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003161448
View in Google Scholar
Markowski, M.P. (2006), „O reprezentacji”, [w:] Michał Paweł Markowski, red. Kulturowa teoria literatury, Universitas, Kraków.
View in Google Scholar
Nycz, R. (1986), „Tezy o mimetyczności”, [w:] Janusz Sławiński, red. Teoretycznoliterackie tematy i problemy, Ossolineum, Wrocław.
View in Google Scholar
Pym, A. (2007), „Philosophy and Translation”, [w:] Piotr Kuhiwczak, Karin Littau, A Companion to Translation Studies, Multilingual Matters, Clevedon.
View in Google Scholar
Pym, A. (2014), Exploring Translation Theories, wyd. 2, Routledge, London.
View in Google Scholar
Rawling, J.P., Wilson, P., red. (2019), The Routledge Handbook of Translation and Philosophy, Routledge, London. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315678481
View in Google Scholar
Schiffrin, D. (1994), Approaches to Discourse, Blackwell, Oxford.
View in Google Scholar
Simon, S. (2012), Cities in Translation: Intersections of Language and Memory, Routledge, London.
View in Google Scholar
Sousa Santos de, B. (2016), The difficult democracy. Una mirada desde la periferia Europea, Editorial Akal.
View in Google Scholar
Sousa Santos de, B. (2018), Constructing the Epistemologies of the South. Antología Esencial, CLACSO, Buenos Aires.
View in Google Scholar
Tokarz, B. (2018), „Przygoda estetyczno-mentalna w przekładzie”, Przekłady Literatur Słowiańskich. 9(1): 17-36. https://doi.org/10.31261/PLS.2018.09.01.02. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31261/PLS.2018.09.01.02
View in Google Scholar
Toury, G. (2000), „Pojęcie «domniemanego przekładu». Zaproszenie do nowej dyskusji”, [w:] Piotr Fast, Katarzyna Jastrzębska-Żemła, red. Komparatystyka literacka a przekład, Studia o przekładzie, t. 10, Wydawnictwo „Śląsk”, Katowice.
View in Google Scholar
Tymoczko, M. (2007), Enlarging Translation, Empowering Translators, St. Jerome, Manchester.
View in Google Scholar
Tymoczko, M. (2019), „Translation Theory and Philosophy”, [w:] J. Piers Rawling, Philip Wilson, The Routledge Handbook of Translation and Philosophy, Routledge, London. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315678481-12
View in Google Scholar
Urbanek, D. (2004), Pęknięte lustro. Tendencje w teorii i praktyce przekładu na tle myśli humanistycznej, Trio, Warszawa.
View in Google Scholar
Urbanek, D. (2011), Dialektyka przekładu, Wydawnictwo IR UW, Warszawa.
View in Google Scholar
Weissbrod, R. (2009), „Philosophy of Translation Meets Translation Studies”, Target. 21(1): 58-73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/target.21.1.03wei
View in Google Scholar
Téléchargements
Publiée
Numéro
Rubrique
Licence
Ce travail est disponible sous licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas d'Utilisation Commerciale - Pas de Modification 4.0 International.
