Spójność, zgodność i dyscyplina ugrupowań parlamentarnych: przegląd aktualnych zagadnień badawczych
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.11.2014.32.04Keywords:
parliamentarism, parliamentary cohesion, parliamentary discipline, SejmAbstract
Unity, cohesion and discipline of parliamentary groups: state of the art and the current research
The article sums up the development of a particular subdiscipline in parliamentary research, i.e. the cohesion analysis. By outlining approaches to parliamentary cohesion, it identifies the two major ones: the institutional one, focusing on intra– and extra parliamentary institutions influencing cohesion and the socio‑motivational one, focusing on individual MP’s motivations, shaped by more general or more individual factors (social norms, loyalty, individual preferences). The author assesses possible future developments of the field, noting that the insufficient theoretical framework hinders further progress in comparative studies. With regard to the very few Polish studies of the subject, the author proposes a clear Polish terminology relating to major concepts used to describe the voting behavior of a parliamentary group.
Downloads
PlumX Metrics of this article
References
Born R., Nevison Ch., The „Agreement Level” Measure, and the Rice Index of Cohesion Revisited, „American Journal of Political Science” 1974, Vol. 18, nr 3.
Google Scholar
Bowler S., Farrell D.M., Katz R.S., Party Cohesion, Party Discipline, and Parliaments, [w:] Party Discipline and Parliamentary Government, red. ciż, Columbus 1999, Parliaments and Legislatures Series.
Google Scholar
Carey J.M., Competing Principals, Political Institutions, and Party Unity in Legislative Voting, „American Journal of Political Science” 2007, Vol. 51, nr 1, [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540‑5907.2007.00239.x.
Google Scholar
Carey J.M., Legislative Voting and Accountability, Cambridge–New York 2009, Cambridge Studies in Comparative Politics.
Google Scholar
Carey J.M., Shugart M., Incentives to Cultivate a Personal Vote. A Rank Ordering of Electoral Formulas, „Electoral Studies” 1995, Vol. 14, nr 4, [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0261‑3794(94)00035‑2.
Google Scholar
Cox G.W., The Efficient Secret. The Cabinet and the Development of Political Parties in Victorian England, Cambridge–New York 1987, Political Economy of Institutions and Decisions.
Google Scholar
Diermeier D., Feddersen T.J., Cohesion in Legislatures and the Vote of Confidence Procedure, „American Political Science Review” 1998, Vol. 92, nr 3, [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2585484.
Google Scholar
Figuereido A.Ch., Limongi F., Presidential Power, Legislative Organization, and Party Behavior in Brazil, „Comparative Politics” 2000, Vol. 32, nr 2.
Google Scholar
Hazan R.Y., Does Cohesion Equal Discipline? Towards a Conceptual Delineation, „Journal of Legislative Studies” 2003, Vol. 9, nr 4, [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1357233042000306227.
Google Scholar
Hirschman A.O., Exit, Voice, and Loyalty. Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States, Cambridge (Mass.) 1970.
Google Scholar
Hix S., Noury A.G., Roland G., Power to the Parties. Cohesion and Competition in the European Parliament, 1979‑2001, „British Journal of Political Science” 2005, Vol. 35, nr 2, [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.1017S0007123405000128.
Google Scholar
Huber J., The Vote of Confidence in Parliamentary Democracies, „American Political Science Review” 1996, Vol. 90, nr 2, [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2082884.
Google Scholar
Hug S., Selection Bias in Comparative Research. The Case of Incomplete Data Sets, „Political Analysis” 2003, Vol. 11, nr 3, [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpg014.
Google Scholar
Hug S., Selection Effects in Roll Call Votes, „British Journal of Political Science” 2010, Vol. 40, nr 1, [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0007123409990160.
Google Scholar
Jasiński M., Przestrzeń ideologiczna oparta na politycznych faktach, „Decyzje” 2012, nr 17.
Google Scholar
Kam Ch.J., Party Discipline and Parliamentary Politics, Cambridge 2009.
Google Scholar
Krehbiel K., Where’s the Party?, „British Journal of Political Science” 1993, Vol. 23, nr 2.
Google Scholar
Lissowski G., Wprowadzenie do przestrzennej teorii głosowania, „Studia Socjologiczne” 2003, t. 168, z. 1.
Google Scholar
Mainwaring S.P., Rethinking Party Systems in the Third Wave of Democratization. The Case of Brazil, Stanford 1999.
Google Scholar
Mayhew D.R., Congress. The Electoral Connection, New Haven 1974, Yale Studies in Political Science, 26 (wyd. 2, New Haven–London 2004).
Google Scholar
Miller W.E., Stokes D.E., Constituency Influence in Congress, „American Political Science Review” 1963, Vol. 57, nr 1, [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1952717.
Google Scholar
Özbudun E., Party Cohesion in Western Democracies. A Causal Analysis, Beverly Hills 1970, Sage Professional Papers in Comparative Politics, 01‑006.
Google Scholar
Party Discipline and Parliamentary Government, red. S. Bowler, D.M. Farrell, R.S. Katz, Columbus 1999, Parliaments and Legislatures Series.
Google Scholar
Persson T., Tabellini G., The Economic Effects of Constitutions, Cambridge (Mass.) 2003, Munich Lectures in Economics.
Google Scholar
Przeworski A., Institutions Matter?, „Government and Opposition” 2004, Vol. 39, nr 2, [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1477‑7053.2004.00134.x.
Google Scholar
Rahat G., Determinants of Party Cohesion. Evidence from the Case of the Israeli Parliament, „Parliamentary Affairs” 2007, Vol. 60, nr 2, [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsm003.
Google Scholar
Rice S.A., The Behavior of Legislative Groups. A Method of Measurement, „Political Science Quarterly” 1925, Vol. 40, nr 1.
Google Scholar
Rice S.A., Farmers and Workers in American Politics, New York 1924, Studies in History, Economics, and Public Law, 253.
Google Scholar
Rice S.A., Quantitative Methods in Politics, New York 1928.
Google Scholar
Shugart M.S., The Inverse Relationship between Party Strength and Executive Strength: A Theory of Politicians’ Constitutional Choices, „British Journal of Political Science” 1998, Vol. 28, nr 1, [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0007123498000088.
Google Scholar
Sieberer U., Behavioral Consequences of Mixed Electoral Systems. Deviating Voting Behavior of District and List MPs in the German Bundestag, „Electoral Studies” 2010, Vol. 29, nr 3, [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2010.04.012.
Google Scholar
Sieberer U., Party Unity in Parliamentary Democracies. A Comparative Analysis, „Journal of Legislative Studies” 2006, Vol. 12, nr 2, [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13572330600739413.
Google Scholar
Skjæveland A., Party Cohesion in the Danish Parliament, „The Journal of Legislative Studies” 2001, Vol. 7, nr 2, [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/714003872.
Google Scholar
Słomczyński W. i in., Spójność polskich ugrupowań parlamentarnych, [w:] Wybrane aspekty funkcjonowania Sejmu w latach 1997‑2007, red. J.K. Sokołowski, P. Poznański, Kraków 2008.
Google Scholar
Sokołowski J.K., Metody ilościowe we współczesnych badaniach nad parlamentaryzmem, „Annales UMCS. Sectio K: Politologia” 2009, Vol. 16.
Google Scholar
Sokołowski J.K., W obronie pytania „po co?”. Uwagi o znaczeniu filozofii polityki dla współczesnej teorii nauk politycznych, [w:] Wokół teorii stosunków międzynarodowych, red. W. Mich, J. Nowak, Lublin 2012.
Google Scholar
Sokołowski J.K., Stolicki D., Cohesion of Parliamentary Groups in Poland, 1997‑2013, CBIP UJ Research Paper 1/2013, niepubl., dostępny na zamówienie.
Google Scholar
Strøm K., A Behavioral Theory of Competitive Political Parties, „American Journal of Political Science” 1990, Vol. 34, nr 2, [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2111461.
Google Scholar
Tavits M., The Making of Mavericks. Local Loyalties and Party Defection, „Comparative Political Studies” 2009, Vol. 42, nr 6, [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0010414008329900.
Google Scholar
Turner J., Party and Constituency. Pressures on Congress, Baltimore 1951, Johns Hopkins University Studies in Historical and Political Science, ser. 59, 1.
Google Scholar
Weyland K., Democracy without Equity. Failures of Reform in Brazil, Pittsburgh 1996, Pitt Latin American Series.
Google Scholar
Willumsen D., Understanding Parliamentarians’ Attitudes to Party Unity. A Study of the Nordic Countries, 2010, niepubl., dostępny prywatnie.
Google Scholar
Willumsen D., Öhberg P., Explaining Legislative Dissent in a Parliamentary Party Democracy.
Google Scholar
Sweden 2002 to 2011, APSA 2012 Annual Meeting Paper, SSRN, [online] http://ssrn.com/abstract=2107105.
Google Scholar
Wybrane aspekty funkcjonowania Sejmu w latach 1997‑2007, red. J.K. Sokołowski, P. Poznański, Kraków 2008.
Google Scholar
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
