Intelligence Fusion for the European Union’s Common Security and Defence Policy

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.19.2022.79.08

Keywords:

intelligence, intelligence fusion, SIAC, EU INTCEN, European Union, security, Common Security and Defense Policy

Abstract

The data fusion methods, techniques and tools are regarded as a remedy for shortcomings of information/knowledge management and intelligence production. They also address current needs of the holistic, all-source approach to intelligence. Their implementation means the creation of new organizational elements − ‘fusion centers’. The concept of a fusion center has been introduced to and tested in the European Union for years. This paper examines data fusion processes and elements within the EU and focuses on intelligence fusion capabilities developed under the Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP). The examples of the Single Intelligence Analysis Capacity (SIAC) and EU Hybrid Fusion Cell in the Intelligence and Situation Center (INTCEN) are examined to evaluate challenges, opportunities and limitations of EU intelligence fusion elements. This paper is also an effort to indicate that there are still many elements to be improved within the EU intelligence establishment, including the area of data and information fusion – with the overall aim to effectively and timely support CSDP. Intelligence sharing by Member States with the EU remains one of the main impediments.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

PlumX Metrics of this article

Author Biography

Artur Gruszczak, Jagiellonian University in Kraków

Is a Professor of Social Sciences, Chair of National Security at the Faculty of International and Political Studies, Jagiellonian University in Kraków, Poland. He is an expert of the Centre International de Formation Européenne in Nice. He has provided expertise in security and intelligence matters for the Polish Ministry for Foreign Affairs, the Polish Parliament, the Polish Ombudsman, the European Parliament and independent analytical institutions such as Statewatch, Oxford Analytica and GLOBSEC. He is the author of Intelligence Security in the European Union. Building a Strategic Intelligence Community (Palgrave Macmillan, 2016). He is the co-editor of the Routledge Handbook of the Future of Warfare (Routledge, forthcoming 2023). His current research interests include European intelligence cooperation, democratic security and security protocolarization.

References

“About EUNAVFOR MED Operation SOPHIA”, at https://www.operationsophia.eu/about-us/#mission.
Google Scholar

Belgian Standing Intelligence Agencies Review Committee (ed.), Fusion Centres Throughout Europe. All-Source Threat Assessments in the Fight Against Terrorism, Antwerp 2010.
Google Scholar

Blasch E., “Information Fusion for Decision Making – Designing Realizable Information Fusion Systems”, in E. Shahbazian, G. Rogova, P. Valin (eds), Data Fusion for Situation Monitoring, Incident Detection, Alert and Response Management, Amsterdam 2005.
Google Scholar

Brun O., “UCLAT”, in H. Moutouh, J. Poirot (eds), Dictionnaire du renseignement, Paris 2018, https://doi.org/10.3917/perri.mouto.2018.01.0799.
Google Scholar

Buede D., Waltz E., “Data Fusion”, in McGraw Hill Encyclopedia of Science and Technology, New York 1998.
Google Scholar

Castro Garcia A. de, Matei F.C., Bruneau T.C., “Combatting Terrorism through Fusion Centers: Useful Lessons from Other Experiences?”, International Journal of Intelligence and CounterIntelligence, vol. 30, no. 4 (2017), pp. 723-742, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08850607.2017.1297119.
Google Scholar

Connable B., Military Intelligence Fusion for Complex Operations: A New Paradigm, Santa Monica, CA 2012.
Google Scholar

Conrad G., “Situational Awareness for EU Decision-Making: The Next Decade”, European Foreign Affairs Review, vol. 26, no. 1 (2021), pp. 55-70, https://doi.org/10.54648/eerr2021006.
Google Scholar

Council of the EU, Complementary Efforts to Enhance Resilience and Counter Hybrid Threats – Council Conclusions (10 December 2019), doc. no. 14972/19, Brussels, 10 December 2019.
Google Scholar

Council of the EU, “Council Conclusions on a Framework for a Coordinated EU Response to Hybrid Campaigns”, 21 June 2022, at https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/ 2022/06/21/council-conclusions-on-a-framework-for-a-coordinated-eu-responseto-hybrid-campaigns/.
Google Scholar

Council of the EU, Council Conclusions on Security and Defence, doc. no. 8396/21, Brussels, 10 May 2021.
Google Scholar

Council of the EU, Council Conclusions on Security and Defence in the Context of the EU Global Strategy, doc. no. 9178/17, Brussels, 18 May 2017.
Google Scholar

Council of the EU, Cover Note from European External Action Service (EEAS) to Political and Security Committee (PSC). Subject: Priorities for Civilian Crisis Management, doc. no. 13258/17, Brussels, 16 October 2017.
Google Scholar

Council of the EU, Implementation Plan on Security and Defence, doc. no. 14392/16, Brussels, 14 November 2016.
Google Scholar

Council of the EU, Note from General Secretariat of the Council to Delegations. Subject: Frontex Draft Programming Document 2019-2021, doc. no. 5247/18, Brussels, 30 January 2018.
Google Scholar

Council of the EU, Note from General Secretariat of the Council to Delegations. Subject: Frontex Report on the Functioning of Eurosur – Part I, doc. no. 6215/18, Brussels, 15 February 2018.
Google Scholar

Council of the EU, Note from General Secretariat of the Council to Delegations. Subject: Frontex Report on the Functioning of Eurosur – Part II, doc. no. 6215/18 ADD 1, Brussels, 15 February 2018.
Google Scholar

Council of the EU, Note from Presidency and the Delegations from the Netherlands and United Kingdom to Article 36. Subject: EU SitCen Work Programme, doc. no. 5244/05 EXT 1, Brussels, 11 January 2005.
Google Scholar

Council of the EU, Note from Presidency / EEAS Services / COMMISSION Services / GSC to Standing Committee on Operational Cooperation on Internal Security (COSI), Political and Security Committee (PSC). Subject: Cooperation between CSDP Missions/Operations and JHA Agencies, doc. no. 14265/17, Brussels, 20 November 2017.
Google Scholar

European Commission, Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on the Third Progress Report on the Implementation of the EU Security Union Strategy, doc. no. COM(2021) 799 final, Brussels, 8 December 2021.
Google Scholar

European Commission, Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on the EU Security Union Strategy, doc. no. COM(2020) 605 final, Brussels, 24 July 2020.
Google Scholar

European Commission, Joint Communication to the European Parliament and the Council. Joint Framework on Countering Hybrid Threats. A European Union Response, doc. no. JOIN(2016) 18 final, Brussels, 6 April 2016.
Google Scholar

European Commission, Joint Report to the European Parliament and the Council on the Implementation of the Joint Framework on Countering Hybrid Threats – a European Union Response, doc. no. JOIN(2017) 30 final, Brussels, 19 July 2017.
Google Scholar

European External Action Service, A Strategic Compass for Security and Defence. For a European Union that Protects Its Citizens, Values and Interests and Contributes to International Peace and Security, Brussels 2022, at https://www.eeas.europa.eu/sites/default/files/documents/strategic_compass_en3_web.pdf.
Google Scholar

European Parliament, Reply (17 June 2013) to the Question for Written Answer E-001671/13 to the Council Ins Cristina Zuber (GUE/NGL) and Joăo Ferreira (GUE/NGL) (18 February 2013), Official Journal of the European Union 2013, no. C 371 E.
Google Scholar

European Union Military Committee, “Common Security and Defence Policy: Intelligence and Situation Center (INTCEN)”, Chairman’s Newsletter, no. 29 (2016).
Google Scholar

“EU Common Security And Defence Policy. Operation EUNAVFOR MED IRINI”, May 2020, at https://www.operationirini.eu/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/factsheet_eunavfor_med_irini_070520.pdf.
Google Scholar

Farivar C., “20 Years after 9/11, ‘Fusion Centers’ Have Done Little to Combat Terrorism”, NBC News, 11 September 2021, at https://www.nbcnews.com/business/businessnews/20-years-after-9-11-fusion-centers-have-done-little-n1278949.
Google Scholar

Freytag von Loringhoven A., “Adapting NATO Intelligence in Support of »One NATO«”, 8 September 2017, https://www.nato.int/docu/review/articles/2017/09/08/adapting-nato- intelligence-in-support-of-one-nato/index.html.
Google Scholar

Gill P., “Integrated Terrorist Threat Assessment in Europe: An Overview”, in Belgian Standing Intelligence Agencies Review Committee, Fusion Centres Throughout Europe. All-Source Threat Assessments in the Fight Against Terrorism, Antwerp 2010.
Google Scholar

Gordon J.S., “Intelligence Sharing in NATO”, Atlantisch Perspectief, vol. 41, no. 6 (2017), pp. 15-19.
Google Scholar

Graphia Joyal R., State Fusion Centers: Their Effectiveness in Information Sharing and Intelligence Analysis, El Paso 2012.
Google Scholar

Gruszczak A., “Establishing an EU Law Enforcement Fusion Centre”, European Journal of Policing Studies, vol. 4, no. 1 (2016), pp. 103-124, https://doi.org/10.5553/EJPS/2034760X2016004001007.
Google Scholar

Gruszczak A., Intelligence Security in the European Union: Building a Strategic Intelligence Community, Basingstoke 2016, https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-45512-3.
Google Scholar

Hibbs Pherson K., Sullivan R.A. Jr., “Improving the Quality of Analysis in Fusion Centers: Making the Most of the Nation’s Investment”, Journal of Strategic Security, vol. 6, no. 3 Suppl. (2013), pp. 309-319, http://dx.doi.org/10.5038/1944-0472.6.3S.29.
Google Scholar

Hoorickx E., “Countering ‘Hybrid Threats’: Belgium and the Euro-Atlantic Strategy”, Security & Strategy, no. 131 (2017).
Google Scholar

Jacuch A., “Countering Hybrid Threats: Resilience in the EU and NATO’s Strategies”, The Copernicus Journal of Political Studies, no. 1 (2020), pp. 5-26, https://doi.org/10.12775/CJPS.2020.001.
Google Scholar

Jones Ch., “»Call It Intercontinental Collaboration«: Radicalisation, Violent Extremism and Fusion Centres”, Statewatch Analysis, no. 255 (2014), pp. 1-15.
Google Scholar

Kerchove G. de, “Future Challenges in the Fight Against Terrorism”, in Belgian Standing Intelligence Agencies Review Committee (ed.), Fusion Centres Throughout Europe. All-Source Threat Assessments in the Fight Against Terrorism, Antwerp 2010.
Google Scholar

Kerchove G. de, Höhn Ch., “The Role of European Intelligence in Countering Terrorism”, in J.-H. Dietrich, S. Sule (eds), Intelligence Law and Policies in Europe: A Handbook, München–Baden-Baden–Oxford 2019, https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509926169.ch-004.
Google Scholar

Kozłowski J., Palacios-Coronel J.M., “Single Intelligence Analysis Capacity (SIAC) – A Part of the EU Comprehensive Approach”, Impetus. Magazine of the EU Military Staff, no. 17 (2014), pp. 10-11.
Google Scholar

McQuade B., Pacifying the Homeland: Intelligence Fusion and Mass Supervision, Oakland, CA 2019, https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520971349.
Google Scholar

Morgado J., Jeżewski R., “The Single Intelligence Analysis Capacity (SIAC)” in J. Rehrl (ed.), Handbook on CSDP: The Common Security and Defence Policy of the European Union, Vienna 2021.
Google Scholar

NATO, “Joint Declaration by the President of the European Council, the President of the European Commission, and the Secretary General of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization”, Press Release, no. 119 (2016), 8 July 2016.
Google Scholar

Persson G., Fusion Centres – Lessons Learned: A Study of Coordination Functions for Intelligence and Security Services, Stockholm 2013.
Google Scholar

Regan P.M., Monahan T., “Fusion Center Accountability and Intergovernmental Information Sharing”, Publius. The Journal of Federalism, vol. 44, no. 3 (2014), pp. 475-498, https://doi.org/10.1093/publius/pju016.
Google Scholar

Rühle M., Roberts C., “Enlarging NATO’s Toolbox to Counter Hybrid Threats”, NATO Review 19 March 2021, at https://www.nato.int/docu/review/articles/2021/03/19/enlarging-natos-toolbox-to-counter-hybrid-threats/index.html.
Google Scholar

Sule S., “National Security and EU Law Restraints on Intelligence Activities”, in J.-H. Dietrich, S. Sule (eds), Intelligence Law and Policies in Europe. A Handbook, München–Baden-Baden–Oxford 2019.
Google Scholar

Veer R. van der, Bos W., Heide L. van der, Fusion Centres in Six European Countries: Emergence, Roles and Challenges, The Hague 2019.
Google Scholar

Zandee D., Meer S. van der, Stoetman A., Countering Hybrid Threats: Steps for Improving EU–NATO Cooperation, The Hague 2021.
Google Scholar

Downloads

Published

2022-12-21

How to Cite

Gruszczak, Artur. 2022. “Intelligence Fusion for the European Union’s Common Security and Defence Policy”. Politeja 19 (4 (79):131-50. https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.19.2022.79.08.

Issue

Section

Understanding Contemporary Security