The Use of Conceptual Metaphor in the Interpretive Analysis of Political Discourse
What Can a Political Scientist Learn From a Cognitive Linguist?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.21.2024.92.06Keywords:
interpretive approach, cognitive linguistics, conceptual metaphor, discourse, interpretationAbstract
This article considers the possibility of integrating conceptual metaphor theory (CMT), developed within the realm of cognitive linguistics, with an interpretive approach to political science. The author demonstrates that the theoretical tenets of cognitive linguistics correspond to the ontological and epistemological foundations of the interpretive perspective. Moreover, he points to the need to consider language and meaning-making linguistic processes as an important area for interpretive analysis in political science and shows how CMT can contribute to this task. Finally, the paper signals possible research objectives of such analyses and the potential areas where they could be applied.
Downloads
References
Bachryj-Krzywaźnia M., “W stronę despotii czy normalności? Medialne narracje wokół sporu o Trybunał Konstytucyjny,” in J. Golinowski, S. Sadowski (eds), Pomiędzy mythos i logos społecznej zmiany, Bydgoszcz 2017.
Bachryj-Krzywaźnia M., “Filozoficzne ramy i przesłanki zróżnicowania podejścia interpretacjonistycznego,” Wrocławskie Studia Politologiczne, vol. 21 (2016), pp. 7-23, https://doi.org/10.19195/1643-0328.21.1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19195/1643-0328.21.1
Bevir M., Blakely J., Interpretive Social Science: An Anti-Naturalist Approach, Oxford 2018, https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198832942.001.0001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198832942.001.0001
Bevir M., “Meta-Methodology: Clearing the Underbrush,” in J.M. Box-Steffensmeier, H.E. Brady, D. Collier (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology, Oxford 2008, https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199286546.003.0003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199286546.003.0003
Bevir M., Rhodes R.A.W., “Interepretation and Its Others,” Australian Journal of Political Science, vol. 40, no. 2 (2005), pp. 169-187, https://doi.org/10.1080/10361140500129974. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10361140500129974
Bevir M., Rhodes R.A.W., “Defending Interpretation,” European Political Science, vol. 5 (2006), pp. 69-83, https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.eps.2210059. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.eps.2210059
Bevir M., Rhodes R.A.W., “Interpretive Political Science: Mapping the Field, in M. Bevir, R.
A.W. Rhodes (eds), Routledge Handbook of Interpretive Political Science, London–New York 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198786115.001.0001
Bodio T., Świadomość a zachowania polityczne, Warszawa 1987.
Boeynaems A. et al., “The Effects of Metaphorical Framing on Political Persuasion: A Systematic Literature Review,” Metaphor and Symbol, vol. 32, no. 2 (2017), pp. 118-134, https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2017.1297623. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2017.1297623
Bougher L.D., “The Case for Metaphor in Political Reasoning and Cognition,” Political Psychology, vol. 33, no. 1 (2012), pp. 145-163, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2011.00865.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2011.00865.x
Cameron L., “What is Metaphor and why does it Matter?,” in L. Cameron, R. Maslen (eds), Metaphor Analysis: Research in Applied Linguistics, Social Sciences and the Humanities, London– Oakville 2010.
Carver T., Hyvärinen M., “Introduction,” in T. Carver, M. Hyvärinen (eds), Interpreting the Political: New Methodologies, London–New York 2003.
Charteris-Black J., “Metaphor and Political Communication,” in A. Musolff, J. Zinken (eds), Metaphor and Discourse, Basingstoke–New York 2009, https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230594647_7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230594647_7
Charteris-Black J., Analysing Political Speeches: Rhetoric, Discourse and Metaphor, Basingstoke 2018.
Charteris-Black J., Corpus Approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis, Basingstoke–Hampshire–New York 2004, https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230000612. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230000612
Chilton P., Analysing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice, London–New York 2004, https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203561218. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203561218
Chilton P., Schäffner C., “Introduction: Themes and Principles in the Analysis of Political Discourse,” in P. Chilton, C. Schäffner (eds), Politics as Text and Talk: Analytic Approaches to Political Discourse, Amsterdam–Philadelphia 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.4
Corbetta P., Social Research: Theory, Methods and Techniques, London–Thousand Oaks–New Delhi 2003, https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849209922. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849209922
Croft W., Cruse D.A., Cognitive Linguistics, Cambridge–New York 2004, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803864. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803864
Czachur W., “Dyskursywny obraz świata. Kilka refleksji,” Tekst i dyskurs, vol. 4 (2011), pp. 79-97.
Czarnocka M., Podmiot poznania a nauka, Wrocław 2003.
van Dijk T.A., “Badania nad dyskursem,” in T.A. van Dijk (ed.), Dyskurs jako struktura i proces, transl. by G. Grochowski, Warszawa 2001.
van Dijk T.A., Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach, London–Thousand Oaks–New Delhi 1998.
Dilthey W., O istocie filozofii i inne pisma, transl. by E. Paczkowska-Łagowska, Warszawa 1987.
Dirven R., Radden G., “Kognitywne podstawy języka: język i myśl,” in E. Tabakowska (ed.), Kognitywne podstawy języka i językoznawstwa, Kraków 2001.
Duszak A., Tekst, dyskurs, komunikacja międzykulturowa, Warszawa 1998.
Evans V., Green M., Cognitive Linguistics: An Introduction, Edinburgh 2006.
Evans V., Leksykon językoznawstwa kognitywnego, transl. by M. Buchta et al., Kraków 2009.
Fabiszak M., A Conceptual Metaphor Approach to War Discourse and Its Implications, Poznań 2007.
Fairclough I., Fairclough N., Political Discourse Analysis: A Method for Advanced Students, London–New York 2012, https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203137888. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203137888
Filipczak-Biłkowska A., Mechanizmy manifestowania orientacji ideologicznej w dyskursie politycznym, Łódź 2018, https://doi.org/10.18778/8142-136-2.01. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/8142-136-2.01
Gagatek W., “O fałszywym rozumieniu interdyscyplinarności studiów europejskich,” in J. Ruszkowski, L. Wojnicz (eds), Teorie w studiach europejskich. W kierunku nowej agendy badawczej, Szczecin–Warszawa 2012.
Geeraerts D., Cuyckens H., “Introducing Cognitive Linguistic,” in D. Geeraerts, H. Cuyckens (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, Oxford 2007.
Geeraerts D., “Recontextualizing Grammar: Underlying Trends in Thirty Years of Cognitive Linguistics,” in E. Tabakowska, M. Choiński, Ł. Wiraszka (eds), Cognitive Linguistics in Action: From Theory to Application and Back, Berlin–New York 2010, https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110226096.1.71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110226096.1.71
Goatly A., Washing the Brain – Metaphor and Hidden Ideology, Amsterdam–Philadelphia 2007, https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.23
Howarth D., Dyskurs, transl. by A. Gąsior-Niemiec, Warszawa 2008.
Karwat M., Milanowski W., “Działania polityczne jako składnik systemu praktyki społecznej,” in K. Opałek (ed.), Elementy teorii polityki, Warszawa 1989.
Katz R.S., Mair P., Democracy and the Cartelization of Political Parties, Oxford 2018, https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199586011.001.0001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199586011.001.0001
Kövecses Z., “Extended Conceptual Metaphor Theory: The Cognition-Context Interface,” in U. Schröder, M. Mendes de Oliviera, A.M. Tenuta (eds), Metaphorical Conceptualizations: (Inter)Cultural Perspectives, Berlin–Boston 2022, https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110688306-002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110688306-002
Kövecses Z., Język, umysł i kultura. Praktyczne wprowadzenie, transl. by. A. Kowalcze-Pawlik, A. Buchta, Kraków 2011.
Kövecses Z., Metaphor: A Practical Introduction, Oxford 2010.
Kratochwil F., “Constructivism: What it is (not) and how it Matters,” in D. della Porta, M. Keating (eds), Approaches and Methodologies in the Social Sciences: A Pluralist Perspective, Cambridge 2006, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511801938.006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511801938.006
Kurcz I., Psychologia języka i komunikacji, Warszawa 2000.
Lakoff G., Johnson M., Metafory w naszym życiu, transl. by T. Krzeszowski, Warszawa 2010.
Lakoff G., Kobiety, ogień i rzeczy niebezpieczne. Co kategorie mówią nam o umyśle, transl. by M. Buchta, A. Kotarba, A. Skucińska, Kraków 2011.
Lakoff G., “Mapping the Brain’s Metaphor Circuity: Metaphorical Thought in Everyday Reason,” Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, vol. 8 (2014), pp. 1-14, https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00958. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00958
Lakoff G., “Neural Social Sciences,” in D.D. Franks, J.H. Turner (eds), Handbook of Neurosociology, New York–London 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4473-8_2
Lakoff G., The Political Mind: A Cognitive Scientist’s Guide to Your Brain and Its Politics, New York 2009.
Marks M.P., “Metaphors of International Cooperation,” in M. Hanne, W.D. Crano, J.S. Mio (eds), Warring with words: Narrative and Metaphor in Politics, New York–London 2015.
Musolff A., “Permacrisis, Conspiracy Stories and Metaphors,” Półrocznik Językoznawczy Tertium, vol. 8, no. 1 (2023), pp. 5-21, https://doi.org/10.7592/Tertium.2023.8.1.246. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7592/Tertium.2023.8.1.246
Musolff A., “The Study of Metaphor as Part of Critical Discourse Analysis,” Critical Discourse Studies, vol. 9, no. 3 (2012), pp. 301-310, https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2012.688300. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2012.688300
Musolff A., Political Metaphor Analysis: Discourse and Scenarios, London–Oxford–New York–New Delhi–Sydney 2016.
Pluskiewicz W., Świadomość polityczna – analiza strukturalna, Gliwice 1992.
della Porta D., Keating M., “How Many Approaches in the Social Sciences? An Epistemological Introduction,” in D. della Porta, M. Keating (eds), Approaches and Methodologies in the Social Sciences: A Pluralist Perspective, Cambridge 2006.
Riesigl M., “Analiza retoryki politycznej,” in R. Wodak, M. Krzyżanowski (eds), Jakościowa analiza dyskursu, Warszawa 2011.
Sobkowiak L. “Działania polityczne. Teoria i praktyka,” in A.W. Jabłoński, L. Sobkowiak (eds), Marketing polityczny w teorii i praktyce, Wrocław 2002.
Sobkowiak L., “Świadomość i socjalizacja polityczna,” in A.W. Jabłoński, L. Sobkowiak (eds), Studia z teorii polityki, vol. 1, Wrocław 1999.
Stoker G., Marsh D., “Introduction,” in D. Marsh, G. Stoker (eds), Theory and Methods in Political Science, Basingstoke–New York 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-62889-2
Tabakowska E., Gramatyka i obrazowanie. Wprowadzenie do językoznawstwa kognitywnego, Kraków 1995.
Wodak R., “Wstęp. Badania nad dyskursem – ważne pojęcia i terminy,” in R. Wodak, M. Krzyżanowski (eds), Jakościowa analiza dyskursu w naukach społecznych, transl. by D. Przepiórkowska, Warszawa 2011.
Wojciszke B., Teoria schematów społecznych. Struktura i funkcjonowanie jednostkowej wiedzy o otoczeniu społecznym, Wrocław 1987.
Wolf H.-G., Polzenhagen F., “Conceptual Metaphor as Ideological Stylistic Means: An Exemplary Analysis,” in R. Dirven, F. Roslyn, M. Pütz (eds), Cognitive Models in Language and Thought, Berlin 2003, https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110892901.247. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110892901.247
Yanow D., “Cognition Meets Action: Metaphors as Models ‘of ’ and Models ‘for’,” in T. Carver, J. Pikalo (eds), Political Language and Metaphor: Interpreting and Changing the World, London–New York 2008.
Yanow D., “Interpretive Empirical Political Science: What Makes This not a Subfield of Qualitative Methods,” Qualitative Methods Newsletter, vol. 2 (2003), pp. 9-13.
Yanow D., Schwartz-Shea P., “Introduction,” in D. Yanow, P. Schwartz-Shea (eds), Interpretation and Method: Empirical Research Methods and the Interpretive Turn, Armonk–London 2003.
Yanow D., “Thinking Interpretively: Philosophical Presuppositions and the Human Sciences,” in D. Yanow, P. Schwartz-Shea (eds), Interpretation and Method: Empirical Research Methods and the Interpretive Turn, Armonk–London 2003.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
