O niektórych cechach swoistych ewolucji współczesnego rosyjskiego sytemu politycznego

Authors

  • Władimir Gutorow Petersburski Uniwersytet Państwowy

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.12.2015.34_2.02

Keywords:

the Russian political system, democracy, reforms, elite, empire, models of political management, mass‑media

Abstract

On some peculiarities of evolution of the contemporary Russian political system

The article deals with the problem of Russian political system evolution at the turn of the 20th and 21th centuries. The author attempts to answer the following question: if contemporary Russian state system does not fit a classical model of liberal democracy, is it reasonable to talk about hopeless stagnation of political system in Russia, generated by the process of new bureaucratic deformation, or is it possible to outline some tendencies of Russian state system evolution that fit the process of global degradation of democratic institutions in every region all over the world without any exceptions? The answer implies a quite important verification and statement concerning the situation: does the level of political government in Russian „imperial center” meet that contemporary criteria, obeyed in the development of civilized states. At the beginning of the 21st century, after long period of chaotic decentralization, Russia has entered the stage, when the federal center attempts to „establish order” in the country by means of tough administrative decisions. New stage of Russian politics connected with the Ukrainian crisis and the referendum in the Crimea signifies the explicit tendency of political elite to start a new page of national history.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Władimir Gutorow, Petersburski Uniwersytet Państwowy

    Doktor habilitowany nauk filozoficznych, profesor, kierownik Katedry Teorii i Filozofii Polityki na Wydziale Politologii Petersburskiego Uniwersytetu Państwowego.

References

Gaman‑Golutvina O. V., [Golos v diskussii kruglogo stola: Kakaâ èlita spaset novuû Rossiû?], „Vestnik analitiki” 2004, nr 2 (16).

Grèhem T., Mir bez Rossii? Upadok âdernoj sverhderžavy i ego vozmožnye posledstviâ, [online] http://liv.piramidin.com/politica/grehem_without/grehem_without.htm.

Delâgin M., [Golos v diskussii kruglogo stola: Kakaâ èlita spaset novuû Rossiû?], „Vestnik analitiki” 2004, nr 2 (16).

Dzolo D., Demokratiâ i složnostʹ. Realističeskij podhod, Moskva 2010.

Dovlatov S., Čemodan, [online] http://www.sergeydovlatov.ru/index.php?cnt=8&sub=5&part=2.

Dušenko K., Voruût!, „Čitaem vmeste. Navigator v mire knig” Iûlʹ, 2013, [online] http://www.chitaem‑vmeste.ru/pages/material.php?article=431&journal=116.

Krauč K., Postdemokratiâ, Moskva 2010.

Kʹeza D., Proŝaj, Rossiâ!, Moskva 1998.

Liven D., Rossijskaâ imperiâ i ee vragi s XVI veka do naših dnej, Moskva 2007.

Parfenov L., Vysšaâ vlastʹ Rossii – dorogoj pokojnik, [online] http://www.sppklin.ru/news/415/9476/.

Političeskie otnošeniâ i političeskij process v sovremennoj Rossii, Moskva 2010.

Turovskij R., [Golos v diskussii kruglogo stola: Kakaâ èlita spaset novuû Rossiû?], „Vestnik analitiki” 2004, nr 2 (16).

Glinski D., Reddaway P., The Ravages of ‘Market Bolshevism’, „Journal of Democracy” 1999, Vol. 10, nr 2.

Grigor’ev V., Temkina A., Rußland als Transformationsgesellschaft: Konzepte und Diskussionen, Berlin 1997.

Schlesinger A. M. Jr., The Imperial Presidency, Boston 1973.

Steinsdorff S. von, Die Verfassungsgenese der Zweiten Russischen und der Fünften Französischen Republik im Vergleich, „Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen” R. 26, 1995, z. 3, s. 486-504.

Warm A. J., The President as Chief Administrator: a Study of F. D. Roosevelt, Washington 1968.

Downloads

Published

25-06-2015

How to Cite

“O niektórych Cechach Swoistych Ewolucji współczesnego Rosyjskiego Sytemu Politycznego”. 2015. Politeja 12 (7 (34/2): 7-18. https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.12.2015.34_2.02.

Similar Articles

1-10 of 986

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.