O niektórych cechach swoistych ewolucji współczesnego rosyjskiego sytemu politycznego
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.12.2015.34_2.02Keywords:
the Russian political system, democracy, reforms, elite, empire, models of political management, mass‑mediaAbstract
On some peculiarities of evolution of the contemporary Russian political system
The article deals with the problem of Russian political system evolution at the turn of the 20th and 21th centuries. The author attempts to answer the following question: if contemporary Russian state system does not fit a classical model of liberal democracy, is it reasonable to talk about hopeless stagnation of political system in Russia, generated by the process of new bureaucratic deformation, or is it possible to outline some tendencies of Russian state system evolution that fit the process of global degradation of democratic institutions in every region all over the world without any exceptions? The answer implies a quite important verification and statement concerning the situation: does the level of political government in Russian „imperial center” meet that contemporary criteria, obeyed in the development of civilized states. At the beginning of the 21st century, after long period of chaotic decentralization, Russia has entered the stage, when the federal center attempts to „establish order” in the country by means of tough administrative decisions. New stage of Russian politics connected with the Ukrainian crisis and the referendum in the Crimea signifies the explicit tendency of political elite to start a new page of national history.
Downloads
PlumX Metrics of this article
References
Gaman‑Golutvina O. V., [Golos v diskussii kruglogo stola: Kakaâ èlita spaset novuû Rossiû?], „Vestnik analitiki” 2004, nr 2 (16).
Google Scholar
Grèhem T., Mir bez Rossii? Upadok âdernoj sverhderžavy i ego vozmožnye posledstviâ, [online] http://liv.piramidin.com/politica/grehem_without/grehem_without.htm.
Google Scholar
Delâgin M., [Golos v diskussii kruglogo stola: Kakaâ èlita spaset novuû Rossiû?], „Vestnik analitiki” 2004, nr 2 (16).
Google Scholar
Dzolo D., Demokratiâ i složnostʹ. Realističeskij podhod, Moskva 2010.
Google Scholar
Dovlatov S., Čemodan, [online] http://www.sergeydovlatov.ru/index.php?cnt=8&sub=5&part=2.
Google Scholar
Dušenko K., Voruût!, „Čitaem vmeste. Navigator v mire knig” Iûlʹ, 2013, [online] http://www.chitaem‑vmeste.ru/pages/material.php?article=431&journal=116.
Google Scholar
Krauč K., Postdemokratiâ, Moskva 2010.
Google Scholar
Kʹeza D., Proŝaj, Rossiâ!, Moskva 1998.
Google Scholar
Liven D., Rossijskaâ imperiâ i ee vragi s XVI veka do naših dnej, Moskva 2007.
Google Scholar
Parfenov L., Vysšaâ vlastʹ Rossii – dorogoj pokojnik, [online] http://www.sppklin.ru/news/415/9476/.
Google Scholar
Političeskie otnošeniâ i političeskij process v sovremennoj Rossii, Moskva 2010.
Google Scholar
Turovskij R., [Golos v diskussii kruglogo stola: Kakaâ èlita spaset novuû Rossiû?], „Vestnik analitiki” 2004, nr 2 (16).
Google Scholar
Glinski D., Reddaway P., The Ravages of ‘Market Bolshevism’, „Journal of Democracy” 1999, Vol. 10, nr 2.
Google Scholar
Grigor’ev V., Temkina A., Rußland als Transformationsgesellschaft: Konzepte und Diskussionen, Berlin 1997.
Google Scholar
Schlesinger A. M. Jr., The Imperial Presidency, Boston 1973.
Google Scholar
Steinsdorff S. von, Die Verfassungsgenese der Zweiten Russischen und der Fünften Französischen Republik im Vergleich, „Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen” R. 26, 1995, z. 3, s. 486-504.
Google Scholar
Warm A. J., The President as Chief Administrator: a Study of F. D. Roosevelt, Washington 1968.
Google Scholar
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.