Polityczna i obywatelska aktywność ludności współczesnej Rosji
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.12.2015.34_2.06Keywords:
activity, participation, stability, civic participation, political engagement, political stability, political institutionalization, protest engagementAbstract
Political and civic activity of people in contemporary Russia
The Author proceeds from the issue that in developed society citizens’ participation in politics is regarded to be standard. It is maintained in the paper that impetuous political activity of Russian citizens happen to be the result of hybrid level of political culture of Russian society, as well as endevours undertaken by the authorities in order to minimize and control the phenomenon. The above mentioned activity is limited by relatively low level of political institutionalization and certain disillusionment in democracy. The Author predicts new tendencies of citizens’ activity manifestations and concludes that mixture of autonomous, rational, self‑dependent and encouraged activity of people seem to be optimal in contemporary circumstances.
Downloads
PlumX Metrics of this article
References
Bagdasarân V. È., Sulakšin S. S., Vysšie cennosti Rossijskogo gosudarstva, Moskva 2012.
Google Scholar
VCIOM. Press‑vypusk nr 2187 „Skolʹko v Rossii patriotov”; press‑vypusk nr 2451 „Patriotizm‑graždanstvo”.
Google Scholar
VCIOM, Èkspress VCIOM nr 39, 22‑23 X 2005, èkspres VCIOM nr 38, 20‑21 X 2012.
Google Scholar
Graždanskoe učastie: otvetstvennostʹ, soobŝestvo, vlastʹ, Moskva 1997.
Google Scholar
Dalʹ R., Poliarhiâ: učastie i oppoziciâ, Moskva 2010.
Google Scholar
Dalʹ R., Problemy graždanskoj kompetentnosti, [online] http://www.politnauka.org/library/teoria/dahl.php.
Google Scholar
Inozemcev V. L., Za predelami èkonomičeskogo obŝestva, Moskva 1998.
Google Scholar
Inglhart R., Velʹcelʹ K., Modernizaciâ, kulʹturnye izmeneniâ i demokratiâ: Posledovatelʹnostʹ čelovečeskogo razvitiâ, Moskva 2011.
Google Scholar
Inglhart R., Postmodern: menâûŝiesâ cennosti i izmenâûŝiesâ obŝestva, „Polis (Političeskie issledovaniâ)” 1997, nr 4.
Google Scholar
Lokk Dž., Sočineniâ. V 3‑h t., t. 3, Moskva 1988.
Google Scholar
Materialy Plenuma Centralʹnogo Komiteta KPSS, 10 aprelâ 1984 g., Moskva 1984.
Google Scholar
Martʹânov V., Postindustrialʹnoe obŝestvo dlâ Rossii: mif, teoriâ, realʹnaâ alʹternativa?, „Logos” 2008, nr 1(64).
Google Scholar
Nort D., Uollis D., Vajngast B., Nasilie i socialʹnye porâdki. Konceptualʹnye ramki dlâ interpretacii pisʹmennoj istorii čelovečestva, Moskva 2011.
Google Scholar
Rejngolʹd G., Umnaâ tolpa: novaâ socialʹnaâ revolûciâ, Moskva 2006.
Google Scholar
Tokvilʹ A., Staryj porâdok i revolûciâ, Moskva 1997.
Google Scholar
Hantington S., Političeskij porâdok v menâûŝihsâ obŝestvah, Moskva 2004.
Google Scholar
Holmskaâ M. R., Političeskoe učastie kak obʺekt issledovaniâ. Obzor otečestvennoj literatury, „Polis” 1999, nr 5.
Google Scholar
Černyšov S., Protest umer, da zdravstvuet protest, „Èkspert Sibirʹ” 2013, nr 5.
Google Scholar
Fedorčenko S. N., Političeskij flèšmob – predvestnik novogo obŝestva?, „Problemnyj analiz i gosudarstvenno‑upravlenčeskoe proektirovanie” 2001, t. 4, nr 6 (20).
Google Scholar
Locke J., Dwa traktaty o rządzie, przeł. Z. Rau, Warszawa 1992, Biblioteka Klasyków Filozofii.
Google Scholar
Nagel J. N., Participation, New York 1987.
Google Scholar
Tocqueville A. de, Dawny ustrój i rewolucja, przeł. A. Wolska, Warszawa 1970.
Google Scholar
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
