Polityczna i obywatelska aktywność ludności współczesnej Rosji
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.12.2015.34_2.06Keywords:
activity, participation, stability, civic participation, political engagement, political stability, political institutionalization, protest engagementAbstract
Political and civic activity of people in contemporary Russia
The Author proceeds from the issue that in developed society citizens’ participation in politics is regarded to be standard. It is maintained in the paper that impetuous political activity of Russian citizens happen to be the result of hybrid level of political culture of Russian society, as well as endevours undertaken by the authorities in order to minimize and control the phenomenon. The above mentioned activity is limited by relatively low level of political institutionalization and certain disillusionment in democracy. The Author predicts new tendencies of citizens’ activity manifestations and concludes that mixture of autonomous, rational, self‑dependent and encouraged activity of people seem to be optimal in contemporary circumstances.
Downloads
References
Bagdasarân V. È., Sulakšin S. S., Vysšie cennosti Rossijskogo gosudarstva, Moskva 2012.
VCIOM. Press‑vypusk nr 2187 „Skolʹko v Rossii patriotov”; press‑vypusk nr 2451 „Patriotizm‑graždanstvo”.
VCIOM, Èkspress VCIOM nr 39, 22‑23 X 2005, èkspres VCIOM nr 38, 20‑21 X 2012.
Graždanskoe učastie: otvetstvennostʹ, soobŝestvo, vlastʹ, Moskva 1997.
Dalʹ R., Poliarhiâ: učastie i oppoziciâ, Moskva 2010.
Dalʹ R., Problemy graždanskoj kompetentnosti, [online] http://www.politnauka.org/library/teoria/dahl.php.
Inozemcev V. L., Za predelami èkonomičeskogo obŝestva, Moskva 1998.
Inglhart R., Velʹcelʹ K., Modernizaciâ, kulʹturnye izmeneniâ i demokratiâ: Posledovatelʹnostʹ čelovečeskogo razvitiâ, Moskva 2011.
Inglhart R., Postmodern: menâûŝiesâ cennosti i izmenâûŝiesâ obŝestva, „Polis (Političeskie issledovaniâ)” 1997, nr 4.
Lokk Dž., Sočineniâ. V 3‑h t., t. 3, Moskva 1988.
Materialy Plenuma Centralʹnogo Komiteta KPSS, 10 aprelâ 1984 g., Moskva 1984.
Martʹânov V., Postindustrialʹnoe obŝestvo dlâ Rossii: mif, teoriâ, realʹnaâ alʹternativa?, „Logos” 2008, nr 1(64).
Nort D., Uollis D., Vajngast B., Nasilie i socialʹnye porâdki. Konceptualʹnye ramki dlâ interpretacii pisʹmennoj istorii čelovečestva, Moskva 2011.
Rejngolʹd G., Umnaâ tolpa: novaâ socialʹnaâ revolûciâ, Moskva 2006.
Tokvilʹ A., Staryj porâdok i revolûciâ, Moskva 1997.
Hantington S., Političeskij porâdok v menâûŝihsâ obŝestvah, Moskva 2004.
Holmskaâ M. R., Političeskoe učastie kak obʺekt issledovaniâ. Obzor otečestvennoj literatury, „Polis” 1999, nr 5.
Černyšov S., Protest umer, da zdravstvuet protest, „Èkspert Sibirʹ” 2013, nr 5.
Fedorčenko S. N., Političeskij flèšmob – predvestnik novogo obŝestva?, „Problemnyj analiz i gosudarstvenno‑upravlenčeskoe proektirovanie” 2001, t. 4, nr 6 (20).
Locke J., Dwa traktaty o rządzie, przeł. Z. Rau, Warszawa 1992, Biblioteka Klasyków Filozofii.
Nagel J. N., Participation, New York 1987.
Tocqueville A. de, Dawny ustrój i rewolucja, przeł. A. Wolska, Warszawa 1970.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
