Od comitativu do spójnika. O pochodzeniu słowiańskiego spójnika i oraz litewskiego ir ‘i; też’
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12797/LV.12.2017.24.10Słowa kluczowe:
etymologia, składnia historyczna, języki bałtyckie i słowiańskie, gramatykalizacja, typologiaAbstrakt
From Comitative to Conjunction. On the Origin of the Slavic Conjunction i and Lithuanian ir ‘and; also’
The paper aims to describe the origin of the Slavic conjunction i ‘and’ and its Baltic counterpart ir ‘and; also’ (Old Prussian ir ‘also’, Lithuanian ‘and; also’, Latvian ‘and; also; even’). Common Baltic ir traces back to the former *ī-r that stems from the conflation of demonstrative pronoun (instr. sg.) *h₁i-h₁ and locative postposition -r. On the basis of Baltic data we can establish the primary character of Slavic i ‘and’ which illustrates the functional change from comitative to coordinative conjunction.
Pobrania
Bibliografia
Ambrazas V., 2006, Lietuvių kalbos istorinė sintaksė, Vilnius.
Bakker E.J., 1993, Boundaries, Topics, and the Structure of Discourse. An Investigation of the Ancient Greek Particle Dé, „Studies in Language” 17, nr 2, s. 275–311, [on-line:] http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/sl.17.2.02bak.
Benveniste E., 1960/1966, ‘Etre’ et ‘avoir’ dans leurs fonctions linguistiques, „Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris” 55, s. 113–134 [przedr.: idem, Problèmes de linguistique générale, Paris 1966, s. 187–207].
Boryś W., 2005, Słownik etymologiczny języka polskiego, Kraków.
Clark E.V., 1978, Locationals: Existential, Locative, and Possessive Constructions, [w:] J.H. Greenberg, Ch.A. Ferguson, E.A. Moravcsik (red.), Universals of Human Language, t. 4: Syntax, Stanford, s. 85–126.
Diessel H., 1997, Predicative Demonstratives, [w:] Proceedings of the Twenty-Third Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: General Session and Parasession on Pragmatics and Grammatical Structure, s. 72–82, [on-line:] http://dx.doi.org/10.3765/bls.v23i1.1282.
Diessel H., 1999, The Morphosyntax of Demonstratives in Synchrony and Diachrony, „Linguistic Typology” 3, s. 1–49, [on-line:] https://doi.org/10.1515/lity.1999.3.1.1.
Dixon R.M.W., 2009, The Semantics of Clause Linking in Typological Perspective, [w:] R.M.W. Dixon, A. Aikhenvald (red.), The Semantics of Clause Linking. A Cross-Linguistic Typology, Oxford, s. 1–55.
DP: Postilla Catholicka. Tái est: Ižguldimas Ewangeliu kiekwienos Nedelos ir szwętes per wissús metús. Per Kúnigą Mikaloiv Davkszą Kanonîką Médnikų… 1599, [w:] J. Palionis (red.), Mikalojaus Daukšos 1599 metų Postilė ir jos šaltiniai, Vilnius 2000.
Endzelin J., 1922, Lettische Grammatik, Riga.
Ford G.B, 1967, esti und yra in Vilentas’ Enchiridion, „Zeitschrift für Slavische Philologie” 30, s. 353–357.
Forker D., 2016, Toward a Typology for Additive Markers, „Lingua” 180, s. 69–100, [on-line:] https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2016.03.008.
Fraenkel E., 1962–1965, Litauisches etymologisches Wörterbuch, Heidelberg.
Frajzyngier Z., 1996, Grammaticalization of the Complex Sentence. A Case Study in Chadic, Amsterdam – Philadelphia.
Griffith A., 2011, The Etymology of OIr. ocus “and” and Methodology, [on-line:] https://www.univie.ac.at/indogermanistik/download/Griffith/Marburg/The%20Etymology%20of%20ocus.pdf.
Haspelmath M., 2007, Coordination, [w:] T. Shopen (red.), Language Typology and Syntactic Description, t. 2: Complex Constructions, Cambridge, s. 1–51.
Heine B., 1997, Cognitive Foundations of Grammar, Oxford.
Klingenschmitt G., 2008, Lit. úošvis, „Baltistica” 43, nr 3, s. 405–429, [on-line:] http://dx.doi.org/10.15388/baltistica.43.3.1392.
König E., 1991, The Meaning of Focus Particles. A Comparative Perspective, London – New York.
Lehmann Ch., 1995, Thoughts on Grammaticalization, München – Newcastle.
LKŽ: Lietuvių kalbos žodynas, Vilnius 1968–2002.
Lyons J., 1967, A Note on Possessive, Existential, and Locative Sentences, „Foundations of Language” 3, nr 4, s. 390–396.
Malchukov A.L., 2004, Towards a Semantic Typology of Adversative and Contrast Marking, „Journal of Semantics” 21, nr 2, s. 177–198, [on-line:] https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/21.2.177.
Mithun M., 1988, The Grammaticization of Coordination, [w:] J. Haiman, S.A. Thompson (red.), Clause Combining in Grammar and Discourse, Amsterdam – Philadelphia, s. 181–225.
Nedoma R., 2011, Altisländisches Lesebuch. Ausgewählte Texte und Minimalwörterbuch des Altisländischen, Heidelberg.
Ostrowski N., 2014, Once again on the Postponed Neuter Pronoun -ti, „Baltistica” 49, nr 2, s. 265–278, [on-line:] http://dx.doi.org/10.15388/baltistica.49.2.2217.
Ostrowski N., 2015, The Origin of the Lithuanian Particle jùk, [w:] A. Judžentis, S. Kessler (red.), Contributions to Syntax and Morphology. Proceedings of the 4th Greifswald University Conference on Baltic Languages, Berlin, s. 201–215.
Ostrowski N., 2017, Non-verbal Predication in Baltic. Lithuanian yrà, [w:] M. Németh, B. Podolak, M. Urban (red.), Essays in the History of Languages and Linguistics. Dedicated to Marek Stachowski on the Occasion of his 60th Birthday, Kraków, s. 463–471.
Ostrowski N., w druku, „Natural Coordination” and the Origin of the Lithuanian Conjunction beĩ ‘and’. Remarks to Old Prussian-Lithuanian Language Contacts.
Owiński K., 2016, Rozwój funkcjonalny spójników „a” oraz „i” w języku czeskim do XVII wieku na tle stanu współczesnego, Uniwersytet Jagielloński, praca magisterska.
Payne J.R., 1985, Complex Phrases and Complex Sentences, [w:] T. Shopen (red.), Language Typology and Syntactic Description, t. 2: Complex Constructions, Cambridge, s. 3–41.
Petit D., 2010, On Presentative Particles in the Baltic Languages, [w:] N. Nau, N. Ostrowski, Particles and Connectives in Baltic, Vilnius, s. 151–170.
Rejzek J., 2001, Český etymologický slovník, Vozice.
Schmalstieg W.R., 1995, An Introduction to Old Russian, „Journal of Indo-European Studies Monograph Series”, nr 15, Washington.
Stang Ch.S., 1947/1970, Esti et yra dans les Punktay Sakimu de Szyrwid, „Norsk Tidskrift for Sprogvidenskap” 14, s. 87–97 [przedr.: idem, Opuscula linguistica. Ausgewählte Aufsätze und Abhandlungen, Oslo 1970, s. 172–180].
Stang Ch.S., 1963/1970 = [Станг Х.С.], Третье лицо глагола „быть” в литовском и латышском языках, [w:] Ю. Маслов (ред.), Вопросы теории и истории языка. Сборник в честь Б.А. Ларина, Ленинград, s. 285–289 [przedr.: idem, Opuscula linguistica. Ausgewählte Aufsätze und Abhandlungen, Oslo 1970, s. 206–211].
Stassen L., 2000, AND-Languages and WITH-Languages, „Linguistic Typology” 4, nr 1, s. 1–54, [on-line:] https://doi.org/10.1515/lity.2000.4.1.1.
Stassen L., 2001, Noun Phrase Coordination, [w:] M. Haspelmath i in. (red.), Language Typology and Language Universals, t. 2, Berlin – New York, s. 1105–1111.
Traugott E.C., 1985, Conditional Markers, [w:] J. Haiman (red.), Iconicity in Syntax, Amsterdam – Philadelphia, s. 289–307.
Vasmer–Trubačev 1986 [= Фасмер], Зтимологический словарь русского языка, перевод с немецкого и дополнения члена-корреспондента АН СССР О.Н. Трубачева, т. I–II, Москва.
Wackernagel J., 1924, Vorlesungen über Syntax mit besonderer Berücksichtigung von Griechisch, Lateinisch und Deutsch, Basel.
Watkins C., 1967/1994, Remarks on the Genitive, [w:] To Honor Roman Jakobson: Essays on the Occasion of his 70th Birthday, t. 3: 2191–2198, The Hague – Paris [przedr.: idem, Selected Writings, Language and Linguistics, red. L. Oliver, t. 1, Innsbruck 1994].
Yong W., Jie X., 2013, A Systemic Typology of Existential and Possessive Constructions, „Functions of Language” 20, nr 1, s. 1–30, [on-line:] http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/fol.20.1.01wan.
Zinkevičius Z., 1980, Lietuvių kalbos istorinė gramatika, Vilnius.
Zwart J.-W., 2005, Some Notes on Coordination in Head-Final Languages, „Linguistics in the Netherlands” 22, nr 1, s. 231–242, [on-line:] http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/avt.22.21zwa.
Pobrania
Opublikowane
Jak cytować
Numer
Dział
Licencja
Prawa autorskie (c) 2017 Norbert Ostrowski
Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Użycie niekomercyjne – Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe.
