Future Tense in East Polissian (Border) Dialects
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12797/LV.21.2026.41.17Słowa kluczowe:
czas przyszły, czas przyszły niedokonany, wschodnia Słowiańszczyzna, język ukraiński, dialekty wschodniopoleskieAbstrakt
This article provides further insight into the use, function, and distribution of the imperfective future in East Polissian (border) dialects within the broader context of the East Slavic languages. Futurity – particularly the issue of the imperfective synthetic future in Standard Ukrainian, often discussed in relation to the analogous Romance pattern – has received substantial scholarly attention over recent decades. By contrast, relatively little attention has been devoted to the use and distribution of imperfective future constructions, both analytic (periphrastic) and synthetic, in the Central and East Polissian dialects. An examination of these constructions, alongside other dialectal morphosyntactic and typological features, is essential for achieving a more accurate areal-typological characterization of the (East) Slavic languages.
Pobrania
Bibliografia
Andersen H., 2006, Periphrastic Futures in Slavic: Divergence and Convergence, [in:] K. Eksell, T. Vinther (eds.), Change in Verbal Systems: Issues in Explanation, Bern, pp. 9–45.
Ânkoǔskì F., 1983, Gìstaryčnaâ gramatyka belaruskaj movy, Minsk.
ASH: D.A. Marêêv, Atlas shìdnopolìs’kih govìrok, Kyiv 2019.
AUM: Ì.G. Matvìâs et al. (eds.), Atlas ukraïns’koï movi, 3 vols., Kyiv 1984–2001.
Bevzenko S.P., 1960, Ìstorična morfologìâ ukraïns’koï movi, Užgorod.
Bevzenko S.P., 1980, Ukraïns’ka dìalektologìâ, Kyiv.
Bevzenko S.P., 1997, Formi viâvu majbutn’oï dìï v ukraïns’kih dìalektah, [in:] Р.Û. Gricenko (ed.), Ukraïns’kij dìalektologìčnij zbìrnik. Kniga 3, Kyіv, pp. 213–217.
Bevzenko S.P., Griŝenko A.P., Lukinova T.B., Nìmčuk V.V., Rusanìvs’kij V.M., Samìjlenko S.P., 1978, Ìstorìâ ukraïns’koï movi. Morfologìâ, Kyiv.
Bybee J.L., 1985, Morphology: A Study of the Relation Between Meaning and Form, “Typological Studies in Language”, 9, Amsterdam.
Bybee J.L., Dahl Ö., 1989, The Creation of Tense and Aspect Systems in the Languages of the World, “Studies in Language” 13 (1), pp. 51–103.
DABM: R.Ì. Avanesaǔ, Û.F. Mackevìč et al. (eds.), Dyâlektalagìčny atlas belaruskaj movy, Minsk 1963.
Dahl Ö., 2000, The Grammar of Future Time Reference in European Languages, [in:] idem (red.), Tense and Aspect in the Languages of Europe, Berlin–New York, pp. 309–327.
Danylenko A., 2011, Is There Any Inflectional Future in East Slavic? A Case of Ukrainian against Romance Reopened, [in:] M. Nomachi (ed.), Grammaticalization in Slavic Languages: From Areal and Typological Perspectives, Sapporo, pp. 147–177.
Del Gaudio S., 2017, An Introduction to Ukrainian Dialectology, “Wiener Slawistischer Almanach. Sonderband”, 94, Frankfurt am Main etc.
Del Gaudio S., 2025a, Some Morphosyntactic and Typological Tendencies in East Polissian Border Dialects, “Aktual’ni Problemy Ukraїns’koї Lingvistiki: Teoria i Praktika”, (50), pp. 41–52.
Del Gaudio S., 2025b, Ukrainian Border Dialects in Belarusian Russian Contact Areas: Characteristics and Trends, New York–London etc.
Dem’ânčuk V., 1928, Či rumuns’kogo pohodžennâ formi prijdu-čogo na -mu?, „Zapiski ìstorično-fìlologìčnogo vìddìlu”, XVIII, Kyiv, pp. 313–317.
Dindelegan G.P., Maiden M. (eds.), 2013, The Grammar of Romanian, Oxford.
Křížková H., 1960, Vývoj opisného futura v jazycích slovanských, zvláště v ruštině, Praha.
Kuznecov P.S., 1959, Očerki istoričeskoj morfologii russkogo âzyka, Moskva.
Mackevìč Û.F., 1959, Marfalogìâ dzeâslova ǔ belaruskaj move, Minsk.
Mackevìč Û.F., Muraško A., Oreškova A., 1964, Ob itogah raboty po sostavleniû atlasa belorusskih narodnih govorov, [in:] R.I. Avanesov (ed.), Voprosy vostočno-slavânskih âzykov, Minsk, pp. 39–59.
Nìmčuk V.V., 1993, Ukraïns’kì govori ta bal’kans’kij movnij soûz, [in:] V.M. Rusanìvs’kij (ed.), Slovʼâns’ke movoznavstvo, Kyiv, pp. 41–63.
Potebnâ A.L., 1874, Iz zapisok po russkoj grammatike, Har’kov.
Roncero Toledo K., 2019, A Typological Approach to West Polesian Morphology and Syntax [Doctoral thesis (PhD), The University of Surrey].
Rusanìvs’kij V.M., 1971, Struktura ukraïns’kogo dìêslova, Kyiv.
Šarovol’s’kij Ì., 1927, Prijdučij čas na -mu, „Zapiski ìstorično-fìlologìčnogo vìddìlu”, XIII–XIV, Kyiv, pp. 284–293.
Smerečins’kij S., 1932, Narisi z ukraïns’koï sintaksi, Harkìv.
Tiŝenko K.M., 2009, Ìtalìâ ì Ukraïna: tisâčolìtnì etnomovnì kontakti, Kyiv.
Trunte H.N., 2005, Словѣньскъи ѩзыкъ: Ein praktisches Lehrbuch des Kirchenslavischen in 30 Lektionen. Zugleich eine Einführung in die slavische Philologie, München.
Ultan R., 1978, The Nature of Future Tenses, [in:] J.H. Greenberg, C.A. Ferguson, E.A. Moravcsik (eds.), Universals of Human Language, Stanford, pp. 83–123.
Whaley M., 1999, Tracing the Origins of the Slavic Imperfective be-Future, “OSU Working Papers in Linguistics” 52, pp. 159–170.
Whaley M., 2000, The Evolution of the Slavic ‘Be(come)’-Type Compound Future [PhD Thesis], The Ohio State University.
Žilko F.T., 1966, Narisi z dìalektologìï ukraïns’koï movi, Kyiv.
Pobrania
Opublikowane
Numer
Dział
Licencja
Prawa autorskie (c) 2026 Salvatore Del Gaudio
Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Użycie niekomercyjne – Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe.
