O aspektach muzealniczych i konsekwencjach badań archeologicznych w miejscach poobozowych – aspekty warsztatowe, etyczne, społeczne

Authors

  • Elżbieta Cajzer

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32030/KRZY.2020.10

Keywords:

archaeology of the Holocaust, museology, martyrological monuments, protection, ethics, excavations, concentration camp

Abstract

ON THE MUSEOLOGICAL ASPECTS AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF CONDUCTING ARCHAE-OLOGICAL RESEARCH IN POST-CAMP SITES – TECHNICAL, ETHICAL, AND SOCIAL ASPECTS

Archaeology practised in memorial sites located in the areas of former Nazi German death and concentration camps has become the subject of widespread discussion. By now, archaeology has brought its methodology into the realm of contemporary times for good. How do we conduct research in locations where the history of millions of victims is still alive? What museological consequences do all the archaeological excavations have there? What about the bulk finds we obtain? The present article presents some topical issues that are currently the subject of debate among archaeologists, historians, museologists, as well as representatives of various religious communities. The problem of conducting earth works in post-camp areas is a complex one. While considering the necessity of working in the soil, we have to bear in mind the social and ethical dimension of our decisions. Moving around a place which is at the same time a cemetery and a symbol involves an enormous load of responsibility, and requires a clear-cut definition of the scope and method of the potential intervention. Preserving authenticity, a truly priceless value in the context of the last surviving witnesses of the horriffc historical events passing away, should become the absolute priority. Finding the golden mean, the perfect balance between what (and in what form) to preserve, and the necessity to carry out current protection measures (which, after all, do require intervention) poses a huge challenge. Cooperative effort to develop appropriate models of operation for martyrological institutions seems to be the only legitimate direction, and, perhaps, thanks to dialogue, in future we will be able to create a canon of norms which will helpus to preserve authenticity and simultaneously to take action that requires support from archaeologists.

Author Biography

  • Elżbieta Cajzer

    Archeologist, manager of culture, Head of the Collections Department, The Auschwitz-Birkenau State Museum in Oświęcim.

References

Opracowania

Auschwitz od A do Z. Ilustrowana historia obozu. Oprac. Piotr Cywiński, Jacek Lachendro, Piotr Setkiewicz. Oświęcim 2013

Banaszek Łukasz, Pospieszny Łukasz: Charakterystyka metod nieinwazyjnych wykorzystanych w ramach projektu „Sztutowo czy Stutthof? Oswajanie krajobrazu kulturowego”. W: Sztutowo czy Stutthof? Oswajanie krajobrazu kulturowego. Red. Łukasz Banaszek, Małgorzata Wosińska. Poznań–Sztutowo 2011, s. 33–41

Foks Sylwia: Archeologia – odkrywanie materialnych świadectw historii. „Memoria” 2018, nr 8, s. 16–23

Grajewski Adam: Formalno-prawna problematyka archeologii współczesności w Polsce. „Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Archeologica” 2017, t. 32, s. 13–22, https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6034.32.02

Karski Kamil, Różycki Sebastian, Schwarz Aleksander: Memories of Recent Past. Objectives and Results of Non-invasive Archaeological Research Project at KL Plaszow Memorial Site. „Analecta Archaeologica Ressoviensia” 2017, Vol. 12, s. 221–246, https://doi.org/10.15584/anarres.2017.12.13

Kola Andrzej: Badania archeologiczne terenu byłego obozu zagłady Żydów w Sobiborze. „Przeszłość i Pamięć. Biuletyn Rady Ochrony Pamięci Walk i Męczeństwa” 2001, t. 4. s. 115–122

Ławecka Dorota: Wstęp do archeologii. Warszawa 2012

Majorek Magdalena, Grupa Małgorzata: Auschwitz II Birkenau. Wyniki badań archeologicznych infrastruktury obozowej zwierciadłem życia więźniów. W: Archeologia totalitaryzmu. Ślady represji 1939–1956. Red. Olgierd Ławrynowicz, Joanna Żelazko. Łódź 2015, s. 169–184

Miejsce Pamięci Narodowej w Rdziostowie. Red. Katarzyna Godek. Nowy Sącz 2013

Misiuk Zbigniew, Wrzosek Jakub, Oniszczuk Agnieszka, Sekuła Michał, Sabaciński Marcin, Czajkowski Karol: Wytyczne do prowadzenia badań archeologicznych. Cz. 2. Badania inwazyjne. Warszawa 2019

Nora Pierre: Mémoire collective. In: Faire de l’histoire. Sous la direction de Jacques Le Go, Pierre Nora. Paris 1974

Olivier Laurent: The Dark Abyss of Time: Archaeology and Memory. Lanham 2011

Pawlicka-Nowak Łucja: Badania archeologiczne na terenie byłego niemieckiego ośrodka zagłady w Chełmnie nad Nerem. W: Archeologia totalitaryzmu. Ślady represji 1939–1956. Red. Olgierd Ławrynowicz, Joanna Żelazko. Łódź 2015, s. 135–168

Wright Richard, Stern Ludmila: Investigating War Crimes: The Archaeological Evidence. „Sydney Papers” 1995, Vol. 7, No. 3, pp. 39–44

Downloads

Published

2020-09-29

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

O aspektach muzealniczych i konsekwencjach badań archeologicznych w miejscach poobozowych – aspekty warsztatowe, etyczne, społeczne. (2020). Krzysztofory: Scientific Bulletin of the Historical Museum of the City of Kraków, 38, 206-220. https://doi.org/10.32030/KRZY.2020.10

Similar Articles

1-10 of 12

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.